Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1793032 - python-flask-cors fails to build with Flask 1.1.1
Summary: python-flask-cors fails to build with Flask 1.1.1
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-flask-cors
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: František Zatloukal
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F32FTBFS PYTHON39
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-01-20 14:18 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2020-04-01 14:05 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: python-flask-cors-3.0.8-6.fc33
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-01 14:05:42 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)


Links
System ID Private Priority Status Summary Last Updated
Github corydolphin flask-cors issues 253 0 None open Test fails in test_acl_uncaught_exception_500 with Flask 1.1.0 2020-04-04 10:33:50 UTC

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-01-20 14:18:50 UTC 
python-flask-cors fails to build with Flask 1.1.1:

FAIL: test_acl_uncaught_exception_500 (tests.decorator.test_exception_interception.NoExceptionInterceptionTestCase)
NoExceptionInterceptionTestCase.test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/flask-cors-3.0.8/tests/decorator/test_exception_interception.py", line 209, in test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
    self.assertFalse(ACL_ORIGIN in resp.headers)
AssertionError: True is not false
-------------------- >> begin captured logging << --------------------
tests.decorator.test_exception_interception: ERROR: Exception on /test_acl_uncaught_exception_500 [GET]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 2446, in wsgi_app
    response = self.full_dispatch_request()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1951, in full_dispatch_request
    rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1820, in handle_user_exception
    reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/_compat.py", line 39, in reraise
    raise value
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1949, in full_dispatch_request
    rv = self.dispatch_request()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1935, in dispatch_request
    return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/flask-cors-3.0.8/tests/decorator/test_exception_interception.py", line 30, in test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
    raise Exception("This could've been any exception")
Exception: This could've been any exception



We have talked about this in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask/pull-request/6#comment-35883

This blocks the Python 3.9 rebuild.
Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:32:15 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:25:10 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-01 04:24:47 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule
Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-08 04:24:49 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-03-16).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html
Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-29 04:27:07 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-03-16).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html
Comment 6 František Zatloukal 2020-04-01 14:05:42 UTC 
Fixed in python-flask-cors-3.0.8-6.fc33 .

(By ignoring one test fail, proper upstream fix is still TBD)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.