Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1793402 - qtile uses non-standard Python requirements, 'cairocffi>=0.9[xcb]', failing the build
Summary: qtile uses non-standard Python requirements, 'cairocffi>=0.9[xcb]', failing t...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qtile
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Mairi Dulaney
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1722078
Blocks: F32FTBFS PYTHON39
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-01-21 09:39 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2020-03-16 13:24 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-03-16 13:24:40 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-01-21 09:39:49 UTC 
qtile uses non-standard Python requirements, 'cairocffi>=0.9[xcb]'

The Python dependency generator generates an invalid RPM require.

previosuly, RPM did not abort the build for this, now t does.

See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1758141#c12 and below.



This has been fixed upstream to 'cairocffi[xcb] >= 0.9.0' as part of a bigger change: https://github.com/qtile/qtile/commit/749dfc9bc615b1a3c0cc15e7958d958711b0c2d6

This is included in version 0.14.0+.


This blocks the Python 3.9 rebuild.
Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:31:38 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:25:21 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-01 04:25:00 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule
Comment 4 Mairi Dulaney 2020-03-01 06:18:30 UTC 
Oh, sorry, I somehow missed the bugzilla emails, I'm on it.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.