Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 179541 - Review Request: tinyfugue: A MU* client
Summary: Review Request: tinyfugue: A MU* client
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: John Mahowald
QA Contact: David Lawrence
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-01 07:50 UTC by Callum Lerwick
Modified: 2014-10-24 15:08 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-28 22:08:52 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
gwync: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Callum Lerwick 2006-02-01 07:50:23 UTC 
Spec Name or Url: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/tinyfugue.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/tinyfugue-5.0-0.1.b7.src.rpm
Description:

Hello, I have been making my own packages for many years, and it appears I can finally get them submitted somewhere. This is my first package, I will need a sponsor. I figure I'll start with something easy.

TinyFugue is the ubiquitous MUD/MOO/MUSH/MUCK/etc client for UNIX. This client allows you to interact with multiple worlds simultaneously, create command macros, and create hooks and triggers for automated responses to game messages.
Comment 1 John Mahowald 2006-02-20 03:58:45 UTC 
Builds in mock, looking pretty good so far, though I can't sponsor. Blocking
FE-NEEDSPONSOR.

However, one thing that can be cleaned up, don't use Epoch unless you have to.
Comment 2 Callum Lerwick 2006-02-20 07:24:30 UTC 
I'm confused about that. I swear I read something ~1 year ago in the Fedora
packaging guidelines somewhere about how setting Epoch: 0 was a good idea, but
its not there anymore. Might have been a core thing? Bleh. I'll nuke it.
Comment 3 Callum Lerwick 2006-02-23 06:28:26 UTC 
New srpm and spec, with epoch removed: 

http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/tinyfugue.spec
http://www.haxxed.com/rpms/tinyfugue-5.0-0.2.b7.src.rpm
Comment 4 John Mahowald 2006-02-25 23:55:26 UTC 
You may have seen older fedora.us guidlines.

Good:

- rpmlint checks clean
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED.

I have since become a sponsor, so send me your Fedora account info.
Comment 5 Susi Lehtola 2009-07-15 12:28:48 UTC 
I'd like to get an EPEL branch for this package and am willing to maintain it.

Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: tinyfugue
New Branches: EL-5
Owners: jussilehtola
Comment 6 Kevin Fenzi 2009-07-16 05:54:50 UTC 
Have you asked the current fedora maintainer if they would like to maintain it in EPEL?
Comment 7 Susi Lehtola 2009-07-16 08:41:07 UTC 
(In reply to comment #6)
> Have you asked the current fedora maintainer if they would like to maintain it
> in EPEL?  

I did so twice in bug #457401, no answer.
Comment 8 Jason Tibbitts 2009-07-17 16:14:14 UTC 
The maintainer seems to be mostly away in any case; perhaps you'd also consider offering to co-maintain the package in Fedora.

CVS done.
Comment 9 Petr Šabata 2014-10-24 14:07:53 UTC 
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: tinyfugue
New Branches: el6 epel7
Owners: psabata
Comment 10 Gwyn Ciesla 2014-10-24 14:54:57 UTC 
Git done (by process-git-requests).

el6 exists.
Comment 11 Petr Šabata 2014-10-24 15:08:55 UTC 
Right.  Thanks!
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.