Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1799120 - GConf2: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Summary: GConf2: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f32
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED EOL
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: GConf2
Version: 32
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orphan Owner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F32FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-02-06 15:51 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2021-05-25 15:20 UTC (History)
12 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-05-25 15:20:00 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-06 15:51:27 UTC
GConf2 failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f32

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41315366


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix GConf2 at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
GConf2 will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 33,
GConf2 will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fails_to_build_from_source

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:17:04 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:32:11 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-01 04:24:01 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-08 04:24:04 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-04-02).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html

Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-29 04:25:55 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-04-02).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2020-04-06 11:05:30 UTC
According to the policy, this package in orphaned.

If you wish to unorphan it, claim it via the web interface at https://src.fedoraproject.org/ (bottom part of the left column when viewing the package). When you do, don't forget to also change this bug's status.

(This comment is mass posted to all affected packages and I am not subscribed to all of the bugzillas. If you wish to ask me something please add me to CC and/or use a Bugzilla needinfo. Thanks.)

Comment 7 Miro Hrončok 2020-04-06 11:07:10 UTC
According to the policy, this package in orphaned.

If you wish to unorphan it, claim it via the web interface at https://src.fedoraproject.org/ (bottom part of the left column when viewing the package). When you do, don't forget to also change this bug's status.

(This comment is mass posted to all affected packages and I am not subscribed to all of the bugzillas. If you wish to ask me something please add me to CC and/or use a Bugzilla needinfo. Thanks.)

Comment 8 josef radinger 2020-04-14 10:42:43 UTC
that FTBFS was invalid in my opinion.
s390 was not reachable during build and therefore failed.

a fresh rebuild (without changing anything on my side) succeeded.

therefore the package should get unorphaned,...

yours
josef

Comment 9 josef radinger 2020-04-14 10:55:50 UTC
the failed build with connection errors: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41315366

the OK build (f33) i did some minutes ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43382242
the OK build (f32) i did some minutes ago: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=43382933

Comment 10 Michael Catanzaro 2020-04-14 13:42:54 UTC
Josef, your email server doesn't support TLS, so my mail server refused to send my responses to your private mail.

I see this was a mistake in that nobody is looking at the bug reports and the build failure was spurious. That said, gconf has been obsolete for nearly a decade now, so unless this is directly threatening an essential reverse dependency, I think orphaning is an OK result. If someone else wants to pick it up, that seems fine.

Comment 11 Yaakov Selkowitz 2020-04-27 14:41:31 UTC
A lot of packages still show dependencies on GConf2.  Some of those are definitely obsolete (e.g. libgnome), some may be obsolete dependencies which just need to be updated, and some just still work and haven't been updated in some time.  I think the number is a bit high to just drop it, and the build failure was spurious per the above.

Does the original maintainer want to re-take this, or should someone else take it?

Comment 12 Fedora Program Management 2021-04-29 16:03:34 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora 32 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 32 on 2021-05-25.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
Fedora 'version' of '32'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora 32 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora, you are encouraged  change the 'version' to a later Fedora 
version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.

Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's 
lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a 
more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes 
bugs or makes them obsolete.

Comment 13 Ben Cotton 2021-05-25 15:20:00 UTC
Fedora 32 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2021-05-25. Fedora 32 is
no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further
security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.

If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of
Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you
are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the
current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this
bug.

Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.