Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 179916 - Review Request: docbook2X - Convert docbook into man and Texinfo
Summary: Review Request: docbook2X - Convert docbook into man and Texinfo
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: José Matos
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-03 20:45 UTC by Patrice Dumas
Modified: 2010-07-12 16:41 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-14 20:33:33 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Patrice Dumas 2006-02-03 20:45:46 UTC 
SRPM Name or Url:http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/docbook2X-0.8.5-1.src.rpm 
Description: 

docbook2X converts DocBook documents into man pages and Texinfo
documents.
Comment 1 José Matos 2006-02-06 20:14:58 UTC 
Expect a review soon. :-)
Comment 2 José Matos 2006-02-07 11:26:33 UTC 
I like the package but it fails to build in mock:  
  
Checking for unpackaged  
file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /var/tmp/docbook2X-0.8.5-1.fc4-root-mockbuild  
error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:  
   /usr/share/info/dir  
  
  
RPM build errors:  
    Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found:  
   /usr/share/info/dir
Comment 3 Patrice Dumas 2006-02-07 21:00:06 UTC 
An updated version that builds in mock, and with minor fixes is there:

http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/docbook2X-0.8.5-2.src.rpm

rpmlint isn't happy with libxslt as Require, but docbook2X requires xsltproc
which is in libxslt.
Comment 4 Paul Howarth 2006-02-08 08:08:32 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> rpmlint isn't happy with libxslt as Require, but docbook2X requires xsltproc
> which is in libxslt.

Perhaps you could change the dependency from libxslt to /usr/bin/xsltproc then?
Comment 5 José Matos 2006-02-08 10:36:02 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4) 
>  
> Perhaps you could change the dependency from libxslt to /usr/bin/xsltproc 
then? 
 
I think that in this case this it is just a style issue. I don't have 
any problem with the dependency as it is. :-)
Comment 6 José Matos 2006-02-09 19:57:27 UTC 
Preliminary review: 
 
Review for release 2: 
* RPM name is OK 
* Source docbook2X-0.8.5.tar.gz is the same as upstream 
* Spec file is readable 
* License is correct 
* This is the latest version 
* Builds fine in mock 
* rpmlint of docbook2X looks OK 
  it complains about the lib nature of one of its dependencies but in this 
case it is bogus. 
 
* Package follows packaging rules OK 
* File list of docbook2X looks OK 
 
One minor question, since the package searches tidy is there any reason not 
to BR it? 
 
Package is APPROVED.
Comment 7 Patrice Dumas 2006-02-09 20:51:21 UTC 
It searches tidy and xmllint to rebuild the doc, but the doc needs not to be
rebuilt, as they are packaged.
Comment 8 Marc Bradshaw 2010-07-08 22:48:12 UTC 
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: docbook2X
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5 EL-6
Owners: deebs
InitialCC: 

As discussed with Patrice on epel-devel-list, I would like to take ownership of these packages for the EPEL branches only.
Comment 9 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-09 18:00:50 UTC 
cvs done.
Comment 10 Marc Bradshaw 2010-07-12 03:01:03 UTC 
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: docbook2X
New Branches: EL-6
Owners: deebs
InitialCC: 

Branch for EL-6 does not appear to be created in cvs, have removed the 
nobranch file from EL-5 branch, please create branch for EL-6. Thanks.
Comment 11 Kevin Fenzi 2010-07-12 16:41:08 UTC 
Should be there now.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.