Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 181994 - Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts
Summary: Review Request: doulos-fonts - Doulos SIL fonts
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT 482993
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-02-18 15:58 UTC by Roozbeh Pournader
Modified: 2009-01-29 08:25 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-19 17:31:11 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Roozbeh Pournader 2006-02-18 15:58:58 UTC
Spec Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/doulos-fonts.spec
SRPM Url: http://guava.farsiweb.info/~roozbeh/doulos-fonts-4.0.14-1.src.rpm
Description:
Doulos SIL provides glyphs for a wide range of Latin and Cyrillic characters.
Doulos is very similar to Times/Times New Roman, but only has a single
regular face. It is intended for use alongside other Times-like fonts where
a range of styles (italic, bold) are not needed.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-02-18 20:05:44 UTC
There's essentially no difference between this package and charis-fonts (bug
#181993), so here's a boring cut and paste.

rpmlint says:

W: doulos-fonts invalid-license SIL Open Font License
W: doulos-fonts wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/doulos-fonts-4.0.14/DoulosSIL4FontDocumentation.pdf

The license is acceptable; it's probably worth opening a bug against rpmlint to
get it added.  The second warning is just rpmlint being dumb; there's no point
in paying attention to line endings in a PDF file.

Anyway:
rpmlint output is fine.
The package meets the naming and packaging guidelines.
The specfile is properly named and follows rather exactly that of a previously
accepted package.
The source file matches upstream.
The license is appropriate and included as %doc.

Approved.

Comment 2 Roozbeh Pournader 2006-02-19 17:31:11 UTC
Thanks a lot for the review. Imported and built.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.