Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 189952 - Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator
Summary: Review Request: metapixel - A Photomosaic Generator
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Jason Tibbitts
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On:
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-04-26 02:17 UTC by Andreas Thienemann
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-04-26 16:02:15 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Andreas Thienemann 2006-04-26 02:17:22 UTC
Spec URL:
Metapixel is a program for generating photomosaics. It can generate
classical photomosaics, in which the source image is viewed as a matrix
of equally sized rectangles for each of which a matching image is
substitued, as well as collage-style photomosaics, in which rectangular
parts of the source image at arbitrary positions (i.e. not aligned to a
matrix) are substituted by matching images.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-04-26 04:11:59 UTC
The manpage is executable for some reason.

* package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
* specfile is properly named and is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible and included in the package.
* source files match upstream:
   b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0  metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz
   b0fcb1ad62708478478218190c355fd0  metapixel-1.0.1.tar.gz-srpm
* BuildRequires are proper.
* package builds in mock (development, i386 and x86_64).
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane.
* no shared libraries are present.
* package is not relocatable.
* owns no (non %doc) directories.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
X file permissions are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
O No test suite, so no %check.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.

Comment 2 Andreas Thienemann 2006-04-26 11:10:17 UTC
Updated files are at

Comment 3 Jason Tibbitts 2006-04-26 15:29:38 UTC
Thanks, looks good.


Comment 4 Andreas Thienemann 2006-04-26 16:02:15 UTC
Thx for the review. -> NEXTRELEASE

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.