Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1900610 - F34FailsToInstall: funguloids
Summary: F34FailsToInstall: funguloids
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: funguloids
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Hans de Goede
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F34FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-23 12:43 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2020-12-04 14:54 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-12-04 14:54:02 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-11-23 12:43:13 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (funguloids) Fails To Install in Fedora 34:

can't install funguloids:
  - nothing provides libOgreMain.so.1.9.0()(64bit) needed by funguloids-1.06-36.fc33.x86_64
  - nothing provides libOgreOverlay.so.1.9.0()(64bit) needed by funguloids-1.06-36.fc33.x86_64
  
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.


If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/), your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/

Thanks!

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2020-12-01 23:10:29 UTC
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 2 Hans de Goede 2020-12-02 08:34:41 UTC
This is due to a bump of the ogre versions, unfortunately the new version breaks both abi and api compatibility.

I do plan to fix this, but I do not know when I will get around to fixing this, updating status to assigned.

Comment 3 Sergio Basto 2020-12-02 10:30:39 UTC
Hi,
Just last Sunday I realized what you mean, Ogre upgarde will give a
bunch of work and it will consume a bunch of time, which I don't have. 
What you suggest ? 
Should I rollback ogre to version 1.9 with EPOCH bump ? 

and about Ogre FTBFS on F33, what we should do ?

Comment 4 Hans de Goede 2020-12-02 10:57:46 UTC
Hi,

(In reply to Sergio Basto from comment #3)
> Hi,
> Just last Sunday I realized what you mean, Ogre upgarde will give a
> bunch of work and it will consume a bunch of time, which I don't have. 
> What you suggest ? 
> Should I rollback ogre to version 1.9 with EPOCH bump ? 

Yes I think a rollback would be best, thanks. And then maybe setup a copr with the latest ogre, so that we can try to move things to
that when we find time (if ever), we could then add things to the copr as we port them over; and then once we have everything there move it all over to Fedora proper.

> and about Ogre FTBFS on F33, what we should do ?

If you build the new epoch bumped 1.9 in rawhide successfully, then you can simply close the FTBFS bug with a resolution of rawhide. That is the normal way to deal with FTBFS bugs which are only fixed after the official release (or during the final freeze).

Thanks & Regards,

Hans

Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2020-12-02 10:58:52 UTC
p.s. About the copr thing, that is just something which popped into my mind, it might be an option, but it is not important / is not high priority.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2020-12-04 14:54:02 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 34.

Thanks for taking care of it!


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.