Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1900756 - python-testfixtures fails to build with Python 3.10: TypeError: MockPopenInstance.communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'
Summary: python-testfixtures fails to build with Python 3.10: TypeError: MockPopenInst...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WORKSFORME
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: python-testfixtures
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orphan Owner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 1969156 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON3.10 F35FTBFS F35FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2020-11-23 16:40 UTC by Tomáš Hrnčiar
Modified: 2023-09-15 00:51 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-09 21:26:06 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tomáš Hrnčiar 2020-11-23 16:40:05 UTC
python-testfixtures fails to build with Python 3.10.0a2.

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_____________________ Tests.test_invalid_communicate_call ______________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_communicate_call>

    def test_invalid_communicate_call(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.communicate(foo='bar')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:501: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57f1820>
args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_communicate_call>

    def test_invalid_communicate_call(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.communicate(foo='bar')
E           AssertionError: TypeError("communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.communicate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:501: AssertionError
___________________________ Tests.test_invalid_kill ____________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_kill>

    def test_invalid_kill(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        if PY2:
            text = 'kill() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)'
        else:
            text = 'kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given'
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)):
>           process.kill('moo')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:539: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc584d100>
args = ('moo',), kw = {}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_kill>

    def test_invalid_kill(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        if PY2:
            text = 'kill() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)'
        else:
            text = 'kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given'
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)):
>           process.kill('moo')
E           AssertionError: TypeError('kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (expected) != TypeError('MockPopenInstance.kill() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:539: AssertionError
________________________ Tests.test_invalid_parameters _________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_parameters>

    def test_invalid_parameters(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           Popen(foo='bar')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:478: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopen object at 0x7efdc56d98b0>, args = ()
kw = {'foo': 'bar'}, root_call = call.Popen(foo='bar')

    def __call__(self, *args, **kw):
        self.mock.Popen(*args, **kw)
        root_call = call.Popen(*args, **kw)
        self.all_calls.append(root_call)
>       return MockPopenInstance(self, root_call, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'

testfixtures/popen.py:257: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_parameters>

    def test_invalid_parameters(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           Popen(foo='bar')
E           AssertionError: TypeError("__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.__init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:478: AssertionError
___________________________ Tests.test_invalid_poll ____________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_poll>

    def test_invalid_poll(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        if PY2:
            text = 'poll() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)'
        else:
            text = 'poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given'
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)):
>           process.poll('moo')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:550: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57aa2e0>
args = ('moo',), kw = {}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_poll>

    def test_invalid_poll(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        if PY2:
            text = 'poll() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)'
        else:
            text = 'poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given'
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(text)):
>           process.poll('moo')
E           AssertionError: TypeError('poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (expected) != TypeError('MockPopenInstance.poll() takes 1 positional argument but 2 were given') (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:550: AssertionError
________________________ Tests.test_invalid_send_signal ________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_send_signal>

    def test_invalid_send_signal(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.send_signal(foo='bar')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:519: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc57abc10>
args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_send_signal>

    def test_invalid_send_signal(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.send_signal(foo='bar')
E           AssertionError: TypeError("send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.send_signal() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:519: AssertionError
_________________________ Tests.test_invalid_terminate _________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_terminate>

    def test_invalid_terminate(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.terminate(foo='bar')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:528: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc56a49a0>
args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_terminate>

    def test_invalid_terminate(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.terminate(foo='bar')
E           AssertionError: TypeError("terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.terminate() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:528: AssertionError
_________________________ Tests.test_invalid_wait_call _________________________

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_wait_call>

    def test_invalid_wait_call(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.wait(foo='bar')

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:510: 
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ 

self = <testfixtures.popen.MockPopenInstance object at 0x7efdc56a8790>
args = (), kw = {'foo': 'bar'}

    @wraps(func)
    def recorder(self, *args, **kw):
        self._record((func.__name__,), *args, **kw)
>       return func(self, *args, **kw)
E       TypeError: MockPopenInstance.wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'

testfixtures/popen.py:43: TypeError

During handling of the above exception, another exception occurred:

self = <testfixtures.tests.test_popen.Tests testMethod=test_invalid_wait_call>

    def test_invalid_wait_call(self):
        Popen = MockPopen()
        Popen.set_command('bar')
        process = Popen('bar')
        with ShouldRaise(TypeError(
                "wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'"
        )):
>           process.wait(foo='bar')
E           AssertionError: TypeError("wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (expected) != TypeError("MockPopenInstance.wait() got an unexpected keyword argument 'foo'") (raised)

testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py:510: AssertionError
=============================== warnings summary ===============================
/usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1148
  /usr/lib/python3.10/site-packages/_pytest/config/__init__.py:1148: PytestConfigWarning: Unknown config ini key: django_settings_module
  
    self._warn_or_fail_if_strict("Unknown config ini key: {}\n".format(key))

-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/warnings.html
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_communicate_call
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_kill - Assertion...
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_parameters - Ass...
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_poll - Assertion...
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_send_signal - As...
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_terminate - Asse...
FAILED testfixtures/tests/test_popen.py::Tests::test_invalid_wait_call - Asse...
============ 7 failed, 721 passed, 3 deselected, 1 warning in 3.31s ============
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SqpxEv (%check)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.SqpxEv (%check)


For the build logs, see:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/@python/python3.10/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/01773441-python-testfixtures/

For all our attempts to build python-testfixtures with Python 3.10, see:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/package/python-testfixtures/

Testing and mass rebuild of packages is happening in copr. You can follow these instructions to test locally in mock if your package builds with Python 3.10:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/python/python3.10/

Let us know here if you have any questions.

Python 3.10 will be included in Fedora 35. To make that update smoother, we're building Fedora packages with early pre-releases of Python 3.10.
A build failure prevents us from testing all dependent packages (transitive [Build]Requires), so if this package is required a lot, it's important for us to get it fixed soon.
We'd appreciate help from the people who know this package best, but if you don't want to work on this now, let us know so we can try to work around it on our side.

Comment 1 Tomáš Hrnčiar 2021-01-20 09:21:38 UTC
Hello, is there any update on this? It blocks us from testing other packages (python-prawcore, python-praw) with Python 3.10. Thank you.

Comment 2 Petr Viktorin (pviktori) 2021-01-28 10:42:23 UTC
It might be easier to make python-prawcore use pytest's logging capture, and drop the dependency on testfixtures.

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2021-02-09 15:27:45 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 34 development cycle.
Changing version to 34.

Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-04 20:14:07 UTC
This is a mass-posted update. Sorry if it is not 100% accurate to this bugzilla.


The Python 3.10 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag. If you manage to fix the problem, please commit the fix in the rawhide branch, but don't build the package in regular rawhide.

You can either build the package in the side tag, with:

    $ fedpkg build --target=f35-python

Or you can the build and we will eventually build it for you.

Note that the rebuild is still in progress, so not all (build) dependencies of this package might be available right away.

Thanks.

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10

If you have general questions about the rebuild, please use this mailing list thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/G47SGOYIQLRDTWGOSLSWERZSSHXDEDH5/

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-07 22:58:47 UTC
The f35-python side tag has been merged to Rawhide. From now on, build as you would normally build.

Comment 6 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-08 11:34:29 UTC
*** Bug 1969156 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 7 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-15 20:23:27 UTC
Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 8 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-11 04:22:12 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-01-18).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 9 Miro Hrončok 2021-07-17 23:36:49 UTC
This package has been orphaned.

You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-testfixtures by clicking button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a distribution.

Comment 10 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-01 04:22:28 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-01-18).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 11 Miro Hrončok 2021-08-09 21:26:06 UTC
Hello,

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

All subpackages of a package against which this bug was filled are now installable or removed from Fedora 35.

Thanks for taking care of it!

Comment 12 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 00:51:44 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.