Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 1935865 - F35FailsToInstall: moodle
Summary: F35FailsToInstall: moodle
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: moodle
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Gwyn Ciesla
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
Depends On: 1936055
Blocks: F35FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2021-03-05 17:23 UTC by Miro Hrončok
Modified: 2021-03-09 14:42 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2021-03-09 14:42:22 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Miro Hrončok 2021-03-05 17:23:51 UTC

Please note that this comment was generated automatically. If you feel that this output has mistakes, please contact me via email (mhroncok).

Your package (moodle) Fails To Install in Fedora 35:

can't install moodle:
  - nothing provides php-xmlrpc needed by moodle-3.10.1-3.fc35.noarch
If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

If you don't react accordingly to the policy for FTBFS/FTI bugs (, your package may be orphaned in 8+ weeks.

P.S. The data was generated solely from koji buildroot, so it might be newer than the latest compose or the content on mirrors.

P.P.S. If this bug has been reported in the middle of upgrading multiple dependent packages, please consider using side tags:


Comment 1 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-03-05 18:08:57 UTC
Remi, is anyone working on packaging PECL's php-xmlrpc, or should we just let it go?

Comment 2 Remi Collet 2021-03-06 06:16:30 UTC
(In reply to Gwyn Ciesla from comment #1)
> Remi, is anyone working on packaging PECL's php-xmlrpc, or should we just
> let it go?

I don't know yet

The main issue is that this extension relies on a dead library (libxmlrpc)
and don't know if it will be maintained.

For now we only have a RC version (snapshot of old code from php-src)

BTW, if needed, I already have a spec file ready
and can submit it for review if someone ask for it, and
if someone want to take care of the review.

Comment 3 Remi Collet 2021-03-06 08:03:34 UTC
I'm probably too kind... btw, see bug #1936055

Comment 4 Remi Collet 2021-03-09 14:37:16 UTC
Could probably be closed.

Notice: I think this worth a upstream bug report, as keeping this extension should be discouraged

Comment 5 Gwyn Ciesla 2021-03-09 14:42:22 UTC
They know:

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.