OK - Package name
OK - Spec file matches base package name.
OK - Meets Packaging Guidelines.
OK - License (GPL)
OK - License field in spec matches
OK - License file included in package
OK - Spec in American English
OK - Spec is legible.
OK - Sources match upstream md5sum:
4c49fe60326874e90cc0bf75a10f63d7  pyxmms-2.06.tar.bz2
4c49fe60326874e90cc0bf75a10f63d7  pyxmms-2.06.tar.bz2.1
OK - Package compiles and builds on at least one arch.
n/a - Package needs ExcludeArch
OK - BuildRequires correct
n/a - Spec handles locales/find_lang
n/a - Spec has needed ldconfig in post and postun
n/a - Package is relocatable and has a reason to be.
OK - Package owns all the directories it creates.
OK - Package has no duplicate files in %files.
OK - Package has %defattr and permissions on files is good.
OK - Package has a correct %clean section.
OK - Spec has consistant macro usage.
OK - Package is code or permissible content.
n/a - -doc subpackage needed/used.
OK - Packages %doc files don't affect runtime.
n/a - Headers/static libs in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .pc files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - .so files in -devel subpackage.
n/a - -devel package Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
n/a - .la files are removed.
n/a - Package is a GUI app and has a .desktop file
OK - Package doesn't own any directories other packages own.
OK - No rpmlint output.

Issues:

1. %file should probibly have:
%ghost %{python_sitelib}/xmms/*.pyo
per the python packaging page.

Fix that up and this package will be APPROVED.

Created attachment 131174 [details]
spec file

looks good to me. APPROVED. 
Remember to close this as NEXTRELEASE once it's imported and built. 

A couple of points:

1. Simply adding "%ghost /%{python_sitelib}/xmms/*.pyo" is not sufficient since
the .pyo files are already included in the package courtesy of the previous line
"/%{python_sitearch}/xmms/". The standard idiom for this is:

%dir %{python_sitearch}/xmms/
%{python_sitearch}/xmms/*.py
%{python_sitearch}/xmms/*.pyc
%ghost %{python_sitearch}/xmms/*.pyo

In this case it will also be necessary to have:

%{python_sitearch}/xmms/*.so

Note that no leading slash is necessary for %{python_sitearch} as the macro
expansion includes one already.

2. The version of the package imported into cvs does not have the spec file from
Comment #2. Please be more careful about what you import into cvs (and build?).

Comment #2 was a test spec - I should have pointed that out. The one in cvs is
the correct one.

I'll amend the spec as suggested in #4, test and upload tonight.