Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1957797 - gnome-gmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Summary: gnome-gmail: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: gnome-gmail
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Orphan Owner
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/pac...
Whiteboard:
: 1968808 (view as bug list)
Depends On:
Blocks: PYTHON3.10 F35FTBFS F35FailsToInstall F36FTBFS F36FailsToInstall
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-05-06 13:47 UTC by Tomáš Hrnčiar
Modified: 2023-09-15 01:06 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-18 08:24:54 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Tomáš Hrnčiar 2021-05-06 13:47:28 UTC
Description of problem:
Package gnome-gmail fails to build from source in Fedora rawhide.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.4.1-13.fc34

Steps to Reproduce:
koji build --scratch f35 gnome-gmail-2.4.1-13.fc34.src.rpm

Additional info:
This package is tracked by Koschei. See:
https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/gnome-gmail

=================================== FAILURES ===================================
_____________________ test_body2html[False-a\tb-a b] ______________________
encbody = False, body = 'a\tb', result = 'a b'
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("body, result", testCaseStrings)
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("encbody", (False, True))
    def test_body2html(encbody, body, result):
    
        if encbody:
            body = urllib.parse.quote(body)
        elif '&' in body or '#' in body:
            pytest.skip("Don't test unencoded bodies with URL special chars")
    
        gmapi = get_gmapi(baseMailtoURL + body)
    
        html_body = gmapi.body2html()
    
>       assert result in html_body
E       AssertionError: assert 'a&emsp;b' in '<html>\n<head>\n</head>\n<body>\nab\n</body>\n</html>'
test/test_body.py:108: AssertionError
_____________________ test_body2html[False-a\nb-a<br>\nb] ______________________
encbody = False, body = 'a\nb', result = 'a<br>\nb'
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("body, result", testCaseStrings)
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("encbody", (False, True))
    def test_body2html(encbody, body, result):
    
        if encbody:
            body = urllib.parse.quote(body)
        elif '&' in body or '#' in body:
            pytest.skip("Don't test unencoded bodies with URL special chars")
    
        gmapi = get_gmapi(baseMailtoURL + body)
    
        html_body = gmapi.body2html()
    
>       assert result in html_body
E       AssertionError: assert 'a<br>\nb' in '<html>\n<head>\n</head>\n<body>\nab\n</body>\n</html>'
test/test_body.py:108: AssertionError
________________ test_body2html[False-a\nb\nc-a<br>\nb<br>\nc] _________________
encbody = False, body = 'a\nb\nc', result = 'a<br>\nb<br>\nc'
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("body, result", testCaseStrings)
    @pytest.mark.parametrize("encbody", (False, True))
    def test_body2html(encbody, body, result):
    
        if encbody:
            body = urllib.parse.quote(body)
        elif '&' in body or '#' in body:
            pytest.skip("Don't test unencoded bodies with URL special chars")
    
        gmapi = get_gmapi(baseMailtoURL + body)
    
        html_body = gmapi.body2html()
    
>       assert result in html_body
E       AssertionError: assert 'a<br>\nb<br>\nc' in '<html>\n<head>\n</head>\n<body>\nabc\n</body>\n</html>'
test/test_body.py:108: AssertionError
=============================== warnings summary ===============================
../../../../usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nose/importer.py:12
  /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/nose/importer.py:12: DeprecationWarning: the imp module is deprecated in favour of importlib; see the module's documentation for alternative uses
    from imp import find_module, load_module, acquire_lock, release_lock
test/test_fixtures.py: 1 warning
test/test_main.py: 49 warnings
  /builddir/build/BUILD/gnome-gmail-master-2.4.1/gnomegmail.py:678: DeprecationWarning: The SafeConfigParser class has been renamed to ConfigParser in Python 3.2. This alias will be removed in future versions. Use ConfigParser directly instead.
    SafeConfigParser.__init__(self, *args, **kwargs)
-- Docs: https://docs.pytest.org/en/stable/warnings.html
=========================== short test summary info ============================
FAILED test/test_body.py::test_body2html[False-a\tb-a&emsp;b] - AssertionErro...
FAILED test/test_body.py::test_body2html[False-a\nb-a<br>\nb] - AssertionErro...
FAILED test/test_body.py::test_body2html[False-a\nb\nc-a<br>\nb<br>\nc] - Ass...
============ 3 failed, 209 passed, 3 skipped, 51 warnings in 1.00s =============

Comment 1 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-04 20:14:15 UTC
This is a mass-posted update. Sorry if it is not 100% accurate to this bugzilla.


The Python 3.10 rebuild is in progress in a Koji side tag. If you manage to fix the problem, please commit the fix in the rawhide branch, but don't build the package in regular rawhide.

You can either build the package in the side tag, with:

    $ fedpkg build --target=f35-python

Or you can the build and we will eventually build it for you.

Note that the rebuild is still in progress, so not all (build) dependencies of this package might be available right away.

Thanks.

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.10

If you have general questions about the rebuild, please use this mailing list thread: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/G47SGOYIQLRDTWGOSLSWERZSSHXDEDH5/

Comment 2 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-07 22:58:55 UTC
The f35-python side tag has been merged to Rawhide. From now on, build as you would normally build.

Comment 3 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-08 11:15:17 UTC
*** Bug 1968808 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Miro Hrončok 2021-06-15 20:27:22 UTC
Hello,

This is the first reminder (step 3 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 5 Miro Hrončok 2021-07-07 11:37:07 UTC
Hello,

This is the second reminder (step 4 from https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/#_package_removal_for_long_standing_ftbfs_and_fti_bugs).

If you know about this problem and are planning on fixing it, please acknowledge so by setting the bug status to ASSIGNED. If you don't have time to maintain this package, consider orphaning it, so maintainers of dependent packages realize the problem.

Comment 6 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-11 04:22:46 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-07-01).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 7 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-01 04:22:47 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-07-01).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 8 Miro Hrončok 2021-08-05 16:44:43 UTC
This package has been orphaned.

You can pick it up at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gnome-gmail by clicking button "Take". If nobody picks it up, it will be retired and removed from a distribution.

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2021-08-10 13:01:20 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle.
Changing version to 35.

Comment 10 Miro Hrončok 2021-08-18 08:24:54 UTC
Automation has figured out the package is retired in Fedora 35.

If you like it to be unretired, please open a ticket at https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue?template=package_unretirement

Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2023-09-15 01:06:11 UTC
The needinfo request[s] on this closed bug have been removed as they have been unresolved for 500 days


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.