Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1987362 - afpfs-ng: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Summary: afpfs-ng: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: afpfs-ng
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Michal Ambroz
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F38FTBFS F35FTBFS F36FTBFS F37FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-29 14:33 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2022-11-29 21:40 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-11-29 21:40:57 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 14:33 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
root.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 14:33 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
state.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 14:33 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering
no flags Details
build_aarch64.log (deleted)
2021-11-17 00:43 UTC, Michal Ambroz
no flags Details
build_x86_64.log (deleted)
2021-11-17 00:47 UTC, Michal Ambroz
no flags Details

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 14:33:12 UTC
afpfs-ng failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f35

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72322107


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix afpfs-ng at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
afpfs-ng will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 36,
afpfs-ng will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/

Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 14:33:19 UTC
Created attachment 1807149 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 14:33:22 UTC
Created attachment 1807150 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 14:33:24 UTC
Created attachment 1807151 [details]
state.log

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-01 04:24:15 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 5 Ben Cotton 2021-08-10 13:15:32 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle.
Changing version to 35.

Comment 6 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-22 04:22:36 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 7 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-09-12 04:22:30 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 8 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-10-03 04:22:19 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 9 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-10-24 04:22:14 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

Comment 10 Michal Ambroz 2021-11-15 11:48:08 UTC
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*******************************************************************************
*
* WARNING: 'check-rpaths' detected a broken RPATH OR RUNPATH and will cause
*          'rpmbuild' to fail. To ignore these errors, you can set the
*          '$QA_RPATHS' environment variable which is a bitmask allowing the
*          values below. The current value of QA_RPATHS is 0x0000.
*
*    0x0001 ... standard RPATHs (e.g. /usr/lib); such RPATHs are a minor
*               issue but are introducing redundant searchpaths without
*               providing a benefit. They can also cause errors in multilib
*               environments.
*    0x0002 ... invalid RPATHs; these are RPATHs which are neither absolute
*               nor relative filenames and can therefore be a SECURITY risk
*    0x0004 ... insecure RPATHs; these are relative RPATHs which are a
*               SECURITY risk
*    0x0008 ... the special '$ORIGIN' RPATHs are appearing after other
*               RPATHs; this is just a minor issue but usually unwanted
*    0x0010 ... the RPATH is empty; there is no reason for such RPATHs
*               and they cause unneeded work while loading libraries
*    0x0020 ... an RPATH references '..' of an absolute path; this will break
*               the functionality when the path before '..' is a symlink
*          
*
* Examples:
* - to ignore standard and empty RPATHs, execute 'rpmbuild' like
*   $ QA_RPATHS=$(( 0x0001|0x0010 )) rpmbuild my-package.src.rpm
* - to check existing files, set $RPM_BUILD_ROOT and execute check-rpaths like
*   $ RPM_BUILD_ROOT=<top-dir> /usr/lib/rpm/check-rpaths
*  
*******************************************************************************
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/afpfsd' contains a standard  '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/mount_afp' contains a standard  '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/afpcmd' contains a standard  '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
ERROR   0001: file '/usr/bin/afpgetstatus' contains a standard  '/usr/lib64' in [/usr/lib64]
RPM build errors:
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5fuRPc (%install)
    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.5fuRPc (%install)
Child return code was: 1
EXCEPTION: [Error()]

Comment 11 Michal Ambroz 2021-11-15 12:04:32 UTC
Setting QA_RPATHS to 1 fixed the build problem, but it is probably not the right 
/usr/lib64 seems to be appropriate dir for the aarch64, but build of x86_64 (with the same dir) ends-up without this error/warning (logs attached)

Comment 12 Michal Ambroz 2021-11-17 00:43:40 UTC
Created attachment 1842218 [details]
build_aarch64.log

Build on aarch64 ends-up with:
libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc ... -o libafpclient.la -rpath /usr/lib64 
gcc ... -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/lib64

Comment 13 Michal Ambroz 2021-11-17 00:47:18 UTC
Created attachment 1842219 [details]
build_x86_64.log

The x86_64 build ends-up with:
../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc ... libafpclient.la -rpath /usr/lib64 ..

but it seems there is no gcc ... -Wl,--rpath generated by the libtool

Comment 14 Ben Cotton 2022-11-29 17:01:03 UTC
This message is a reminder that Fedora Linux 35 is nearing its end of life.
Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora Linux 35 on 2022-12-13.
It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer
maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a
'version' of '35'.

Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you
plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, change the 'version' 
to a later Fedora Linux version.

Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not 
able to fix it before Fedora Linux 35 is end of life. If you would still like 
to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version 
of Fedora Linux, you are encouraged to change the 'version' to a later version
prior to this bug being closed.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.