Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1987910 - qtermwidget: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Summary: qtermwidget: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: qtermwidget
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Zamir SUN
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F35FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-29 16:47 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2021-08-07 10:21 UTC (History)
6 users (show)

Fixed In Version: qtermwidget-0.16.0-4.fc35
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2021-08-05 14:15:38 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 16:48 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 16:48 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 16:48 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
View All

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 16:47:57 UTC 
qtermwidget failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f35

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72486867


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix qtermwidget at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
qtermwidget will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 36,
qtermwidget will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 16:48:00 UTC 
Created attachment 1808584 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 16:48:03 UTC 
Created attachment 1808585 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 16:48:05 UTC 
Created attachment 1808586 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-01 04:33:40 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
Comment 5 Zamir SUN 2021-08-02 17:02:54 UTC 
We definitely still want LXQt in Fedora 35. Moving to ASSIGNED in bulks regardless of the package owner.
Comment 6 Eugene A. Pivnev 2021-08-02 20:50:11 UTC 
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #5)
> We definitely still want LXQt in Fedora 35. Moving to ASSIGNED in bulks
> regardless of the package owner.

I am still package owner starting from RazorQt times (if you remember it), but now qterm* packages are hardly depend on lxqt libs and/or build system.
And it's hard to me to build them synchronously with lxqt libs.
What about to pass them to lxqt* maintainer[s]?
Comment 7 Zamir SUN 2021-08-05 14:12:07 UTC 
I'm maintaining the LXQt stuff as a whole, including the qtermwidget and qterminal (although I'm now really busy since last year). So if you are not willing to act as the primary contact for qtermwidget, you can set me as the package owner and keep yourself in admin, or only change me (or the lxqt-sig@ list) as the default contact for bugzilla. Either works for me.
Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2021-08-05 14:14:03 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-1aeee16164 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-1aeee16164
Comment 9 Fedora Update System 2021-08-05 14:15:38 UTC 
FEDORA-2021-1aeee16164 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 10 Eugene A. Pivnev 2021-08-07 10:21:49 UTC 
(In reply to Zamir SUN from comment #7)
> I'm maintaining the LXQt stuff as a whole, including the qtermwidget and
> qterminal (although I'm now really busy since last year). So if you are not
> willing to act as the primary contact for qtermwidget, you can set me as the
> package owner and keep yourself in admin, or only change me (or the
> lxqt-sig@ list) as the default contact for bugzilla. Either works for me.

Default assignee changed tor rdieter (as in other lxqt-*).
lxqt-sig@ is admin now (for qtermwidget and qterminal)
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.