Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1987961 - rubygem-sup: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Summary: rubygem-sup: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f35
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: rubygem-sup
Version: 35
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Dan Callaghan
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F38FTBFS F35FTBFS F36FTBFS F37FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-07-29 17:05 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2022-08-15 14:20 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-08-13 07:53:35 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 17:05 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 17:05 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (deleted)
2021-07-29 17:05 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
View All

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 17:05:26 UTC 
rubygem-sup failed to build from source in Fedora rawhide/f35

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=72492418


For details on the mass rebuild see:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild
Please fix rubygem-sup at your earliest convenience and set the bug's status to
ASSIGNED when you start fixing it. If the bug remains in NEW state for 8 weeks,
rubygem-sup will be orphaned. Before branching of Fedora 36,
rubygem-sup will be retired, if it still fails to build.

For more details on the FTBFS policy, please visit:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 17:05:31 UTC 
Created attachment 1808711 [details]
build.log

file build.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 17:05:33 UTC 
Created attachment 1808712 [details]
root.log

file root.log too big, will only attach last 32768 bytes
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-07-29 17:05:35 UTC 
Created attachment 1808713 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2021-08-01 04:34:36 UTC 
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 35.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (not sooner than 2021-09-23).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 36 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 34 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html
Comment 5 Dan Callaghan 2021-08-01 08:47:54 UTC 
Build failure is in the test suite:

NoMethodError: undefined method `encode' for URI:Module

Upstream issue for this is: https://github.com/sup-heliotrope/sup/issues/588

I'm (slowly) working on a fix.
Comment 6 Ben Cotton 2021-08-10 13:30:11 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 35 development cycle.
Changing version to 35.
Comment 7 Dan Callaghan 2022-08-13 07:53:35 UTC 
I did get this fixed upstream, eventually. But I was too slow. Sup was retired for FTBFS for too long.
Comment 8 Vít Ondruch 2022-08-15 14:20:00 UTC 
(In reply to Dan Callaghan from comment #7)
> I did get this fixed upstream, eventually. But I was too slow. Sup was
> retired for FTBFS for too long.

Just FTR, I think you can still save it even without re-review:

https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Package_Retirement_Process/#claiming
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.