Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2024265 - java-17-openjdk as system JDK in F36
Summary: java-17-openjdk as system JDK in F36
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Changes Tracking
Version: 36
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: jiri vanek
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 2024881 2041573 2045699 2045713 2051124 2051129 2051132 2051133 2051135 2051137 2051138 2051139 2051140 2051141 2051142 2051145 2051147 2051149 2051150 2051151 2051152 2051153 2051155 2051156 2051158 2051159 2051161 2051162 2051163 2051164 2051166 2051168 2051170 2051171 2051172 2051173 2051174 2051175 2051176 2051178 2051180 2051182 2051183 2051184 2051185 2051187 2051188 2051189 2051190 2051192 2051193 2051196 2051197 2051198 2051200 2051201 2051202 2051203 2051204 2051205 2051206 2051208 2051209 2051213 2051214 2051215 2051216 2051217 2051219 2051221 2051223 2051225 2051226 2051228 2062407 2104093
Blocks: F36Changes
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2021-11-17 17:50 UTC by Ben Cotton
Modified: 2022-09-21 10:06 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-05-10 14:41:45 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ben Cotton 2021-11-17 17:50:19 UTC
This is a tracking bug for Change: java-17-openjdk as system JDK in F36
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Java17

Update the system JDK in Fedora from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk.

If you encounter a bug related to this Change, please do not comment here. Instead create a new bug and set it to block this bug.

Comment 4 jiri vanek 2022-02-06 12:38:30 UTC
both
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-17-openjdk/pull-request/6
and
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/java-11-openjdk/pull-request/143
merged.

Mass rebuild runs  5th and 7th of February with aprox 65 failures in sidetag f36-java17. FTBFS will be filled.
Side tag considered healthy, and will be asked to merge.

Comment 5 jiri vanek 2022-02-06 12:39:21 UTC
Also whole javapackages and maven toolchain got merged to rawhide and built for f36-java17

Comment 6 jiri vanek 2022-02-07 12:41:00 UTC
Hello!

The side tag was merged.

Comment 7 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:06:34 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora Linux 36 development cycle.
Changing version to 36.

Comment 8 Ben Cotton 2022-02-08 21:15:06 UTC
Today we reached the Code Complete (testable) milestone in the F36 schedule: https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-36/f-36-key-tasks.html

All code for this change should be complete enough for testing. You can indicate this by setting the bug status to MODIFIED. (If the code is fully complete, you can go ahead and set it to ON_QA.)

If you need to defer this Change to F37, please needinfo bcotton.

Comment 9 Ben Cotton 2022-02-09 19:33:05 UTC
Since the side tag was merged, I'm setting this tracker bug to MODIFIED to indicate that it is testable.

Comment 10 Ben Cotton 2022-02-22 16:34:03 UTC
We have reached the 'Change complete (100% complete)' deadline in the Fedora Linux 36 release schedule.

At this time, all Changes should be fully complete. Indicate this by setting this tracking bug to ON_QA.

If you need to defer this Change to a subsequent release, please needinfo me.

Comment 11 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2022-03-01 18:25:41 UTC
java-17-openjdk is the provider of /bin/javac in F36.
The packages that FTBFS can always be switched to use java-11-openjdk if they cannot be fixed
to build with 17.

Comment 12 Ben Cotton 2022-05-10 14:41:45 UTC
F36 was released today. If this Change did not land in the release, please notify bcotton as soon as possible.

Comment 13 Fabio Valentini 2022-05-16 22:09:03 UTC
I wonder if this change can actually be considered "completed"?
For example, openjdk packages do not get changed from java-11-openjdk to java-17-openjdk when upgrading from Fedora 35 to 36, which is a bit unexpected.


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.