Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 202836 - Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Summary: Review Request: abuse - The classic Crack-Dot-Com game
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Rex Dieter
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-08-16 17:48 UTC by Hans de Goede
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-08-18 05:54:40 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Hans de Goede 2006-08-16 17:48:49 UTC 
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/abuse.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/abuse-0.7.0-1.src.rpm
Description:
This is the SDL version of Abuse, the classic Crack-Dot-Com game. It can run in
a window or fullscreen and it has stereo sound with sound panning.

---

notice that the name could be discussed, I didn't name it abuse-sdl or abuse_sdl because this is THE abuse for Linux, I checked other distro's and only debian has got the original version and that contains a note in its "%description" that it is discontinued and that users are adviced to use the SDL version instead.

This requires a form of abuse-data I'm also submitting fRaBs I'll post a link to the fRaBs review here as soon as I've got one.
Comment 1 Hans de Goede 2006-08-16 17:51:20 UTC 
The fRaBs review is bug 202837
Comment 2 Rex Dieter 2006-08-16 23:14:42 UTC 
I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is
named abuse_sdl.  My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package
name, but that's just me.
Comment 3 Hans de Goede 2006-08-17 06:55:47 UTC 
(In reply to comment #2)
> I see upstream's website has title/header "Abuse-SDL", and upstream tarball is
> named abuse_sdl.  My inclinication would be to stick with abuse_sdl for package
> name, but that's just me.

I can live with that too, but as said this really is THE abuse now these days
hence my dropping of the -/_ sdl I don't want people to start looking for the
main abuse package, cause there won't be one. But as said either way is
eventually fine by me.
Comment 4 Rex Dieter 2006-08-17 19:43:39 UTC 
Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED.

One small thing, you should add
%doc COPYING
Comment 5 Hans de Goede 2006-08-18 05:54:40 UTC 
(In reply to comment #4)
> Looks very good (and fun), APPROVED.
>

Thanks, imported and build, closing.
 
> One small thing, you should add
> %doc COPYING 

Woops, I forgot todo this, I've made the change in CVS now, a new version will
be forthcoming shortly since there are some annoyances I wan't to fix (which
require diving into the source first) such as -f to start fullscreen not working.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.