Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2077790 - Branch and build freeimage for EPEL 9
Summary: Branch and build freeimage for EPEL 9
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED ERRATA
Alias: None
Product: Fedora EPEL
Classification: Fedora
Component: freeimage
Version: epel9
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Davide Cavalca
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
: 2091168 (view as bug list)
Depends On: 2108919
Blocks: EPELPackagersSIG
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2022-04-22 09:16 UTC by Neal Gompa
Modified: 2023-10-19 13:52 UTC (History)
13 users (show)

Fixed In Version: freeimage-3.19.0-0.11.svn1889.el9
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC
Type: Task
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Neal Gompa 2022-04-22 09:16:45 UTC 
Please branch and build freeimage in epel9.

If you do not wish to maintain freeimage in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/freeimage/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
Comment 1 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-19 18:30:58 UTC 
Will you be able to branch and build freeimage in epel9?
The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer
if you do not wish to build it on epel9.
Comment 2 Richard Shaw 2022-07-20 01:01:39 UTC 
You're welcome to take it over. Many of the EPEL 8 packages I tried to maintain was for running MythTV on EPEL but Fedora has been super stable for years even across upgrades so my needs have changed.

I tried assigning the EPEL packager SIG as the EPEL "maintainer" for BZ on another package but it wasn't accepted.
Comment 3 Davide Cavalca 2022-07-20 02:49:48 UTC 
Thanks! Branch requested:

$ fedpkg request-branch epel9
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/45889

It also looks like we're missing a dependency, so I've filed https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2108919 for that.
Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2022-11-25 18:44:30 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a
Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2022-11-26 00:24:50 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information on how to test updates.
Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2022-12-04 00:43:11 UTC 
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9c56e769a has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
Comment 7 Debarshi Ray 2023-10-19 13:52:23 UTC 
*** Bug 2091168 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.