Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 216785 - Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities
Summary: Review Request: perl-Gnome2-Print - Perl wrappers for the Gnome Print utilities
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Parag AN(पराग)
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gnome2-Pr...
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2006-11-22 00:03 UTC by Chris Weyl
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-11-22 15:46:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Chris Weyl 2006-11-22 00:03:52 UTC
SRPM URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-Print-1.000-1.fc6.src.rpm
SPEC URL: http://home.comcast.net/~ckweyl/perl-Gnome2-Print.spec

Description:
This module allows you to use the GNOME Print libraries within your
applications written using the gtk2-perl wrapper. The GNOME Print libraries
(also known as libgnomeprint and libgnomeprintui) allow you to create
printable documents (using various frontends) and offer standard widgets in
order to mainatin a UI consistent for all GNOME applications.

Comment 1 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 04:01:38 UTC
Tell me how can i use this package or test its working in FC6 core?

Comment 2 Chris Weyl 2006-11-22 04:10:58 UTC
There are a number of sample scripts that come in the examples directory (or,
when the rpm is installed, under %doc).  Running one or more of those should
enable you to examine the functionailty of the module proper.

Comment 3 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 05:58:25 UTC
Did mock build and found under build.log
Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread'
Got some rpmlint Warnings
W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-autogen.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl-version.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

W: perl-Gnome2-Print devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi/Gnome2/Print/Install/gnomeprintperl.h
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel
package. If you want to include source code in your package, be sure to
create a development package.

are those can be ignored for perl packages??

Comment 4 Chris Weyl 2006-11-22 06:05:34 UTC
Those warnings can be safely ignored for perl packages.

Comment 5 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 06:32:52 UTC
Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)?
Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming
not understanding which causes this message to appear?

Comment 6 Ralf Corsepius 2006-11-22 06:46:34 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> Not able to find license file(Is am i missing something)?
Yes, you are missing something: Nobody is obliged to ship one.

Perl module files typically contain licenses embedded into their source files.

> Still Unrecognized argument in LIBS ignored: '-pthread' message coming
> not understanding which causes this message to appear?
IIRC, this is a bug/crappy code somewhere in some of the perl-Gtk/Gnome
infrastructure. I recall this had appeared several times before, but I don't
recall all details on how this had been resolved. Googling/searching bugzilla
might provide further insights.

Comment 7 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 07:07:45 UTC
Does that be a blocker?

Comment 8 Ralf Corsepius 2006-11-22 08:01:50 UTC
(In reply to comment #7)
> Does that be a blocker?
I just found a reference:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=166252

... so people seem to preferr to ignore this bug :(

Comment 9 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 09:27:39 UTC
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM and but NOT for RPMS.
  But those warnings are ignored.
+ source files match upstream.
66578c2ffaebbe035a0735e65ad71c3f  Gnome2-Print-1.000.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.  License text included in package.
+ %doc is small; no -doc subpackage required.
+ %doc does not affect runtime.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ .pc file present.
+ no -devel subpackage exists
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available
+ Dose owns the directories it creates.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Followed perl packaging guidelines.
APPROVED.


Comment 10 Parag AN(पराग) 2006-11-22 09:31:26 UTC
Don't Forget to CLOSE this with NEXTRELEASE

Comment 11 Chris Weyl 2006-11-22 15:46:23 UTC
Imported and building for devel; branches requested for FC5,6.

Thanks for the review! :)


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.