==== REVIEW CHECKLIST ====
O rpmlint output:

PRE-INSTALL:
W: alfont-devel no-documentation

POST-INSTALL:
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetc
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ugetxc
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getg
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 uvszprintf
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getb
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 destroy_bitmap
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 getr
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_uformat
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 set_trans_blender
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 get_uformat
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 masked_blit
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 create_bitmap_ex
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 solid_mode
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 need_uconvert
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 makecol
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 drawing_mode
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 ustrlen

post-install rpmlint warnings must be investigated

- package named according to package naming guideliens
- spec file name matches %{name}
- meets packaging guidelines
- licensed with open source compatible license
- license matches actual license
- license included in %doc
- spec written in American english
- spec legible
- sources match upstream (unrared upstream and untarred sources and ran diff on
output:
diff -ubBr alfont-2.0.6 AlFont
(no output)
- package successfully compiles and builds on FC6 x86_64
- all dependencies listed in BR
- no locales
- proper %post/un sections
- package is not relocatable
- package owns all directories it creates
- file permissions set properly
- contains proper %clean section
- macro usage consistent
- contains code
- no large documentation
- %doc does not affect runtime
O header files in devel package
  devel package contains strange header file which looks like a windows version
- no pkgconfig files
- libs w/o suffix in devel
- devel package requires main package
- no .la files
- not a GUI app needing a .desktop file
- does not own files or directories owned by other packages

==== MUST FIX ====
- Investigate rpmlint warnings
- Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package?

(In reply to comment #1)
> ==== MUST FIX ====
> - Investigate rpmlint warnings
This is because I forgot to link the library with allegro, fixed. Now it gives:
[hans@shalem alfont]$ rpmlint alfont
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_r
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_cx_w
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_get_cpuid_info
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_486
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6
_i_is_cpuid_supported
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_cyrix
W: alfont undefined-non-weak-symbol /usr/lib64/libalfont.so.2.0.6 _i_is_fpu

This is normal, as allegro consists of a dynamiclinked .so and a statically
linked .a filoe which contains some non PIC and thus non sharable asm functions.

Also see the "allegro-config --libs" output.

> - Why is /usr/include/alfont.h.linux in devel package?
patch backup file installed by bad wildcard install, wildcard fixed.

Here is a new version with these both fixed:
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/alfont-2.0.6-2.fc7.src.rpm

All MUST items fixed.

APPROVED.

Thanks! Imported and build requested, closing.