Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 2251102 - Review Request: elementary-calendar - Desktop calendar app designed for elementary
Summary: Review Request: elementary-calendar - Desktop calendar app designed for eleme...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Benson Muite
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL: https://github.com/elementary/calendar
Whiteboard: Unretirement
Depends On:
Blocks: PantheonDesktopPackageReviews
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2023-11-22 22:08 UTC by Fabio Valentini
Modified: 2023-12-18 14:07 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: elementary-calendar-7.0.0-1.fc40
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2023-12-18 14:07:34 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
benson_muite: fedora-review+


Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Fabio Valentini 2023-11-22 22:08:55 UTC
Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/elementary-calendar.spec
SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/elementary-calendar-7.0.0-1.fc39.src.rpm

Description:
A slim, lightweight calendar app that syncs and manages multiple
calendars in one place, like Google Calendar, Outlook and CalDAV.

Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe

Comment 1 Fabio Valentini 2023-11-22 22:08:57 UTC
This package built on koji:  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109417319

Comment 2 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-22 22:12:22 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6681038
(failed)

Build log:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2251102-elementary-calendar/srpm-builds/06681038/builder-live.log.gz

Please make sure the package builds successfully at least for Fedora Rawhide.

- If the build failed for unrelated reasons (e.g. temporary network
  unavailability), please ignore it.
- If the build failed because of missing BuildRequires, please make sure they
  are listed in the "Depends On" field


---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 3 Neal Gompa 2023-11-26 01:47:35 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 4 Fedora Review Service 2023-11-26 16:58:32 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6695811
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2251102-elementary-calendar/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06695811-elementary-calendar/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-calendar
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 5 Benson Muite 2023-11-28 16:46:22 UTC
Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
  Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-calendar
  See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-
  guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[ ]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
     Note: Sources not installed
[ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
     BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License v3.0 or
     later", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License v3.0 or later",
     "GNU Library General Public License v2 or later", "GNU General Public
     License v2.0 or later", "GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or
     later". 229 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
     licensecheck in /home/fedora/2251102-elementary-
     calendar/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
     must be documented in the spec.
[ ]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES,
     /usr/share/locale/mo
[ ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners:
     /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/mo
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[ ]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 841 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
     publishes signatures.
     Note: gpgverify is not used.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[ ]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1187840 bytes in /usr/share
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: elementary-calendar-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
          elementary-calendar-devel-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
          elementary-calendar-debuginfo-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
          elementary-calendar-debugsource-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
          elementary-calendar-7.0.0-1.fc40.src.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp_492byjj')]
checks: 31, packages: 5

elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary io.elementary.calendar
elementary-calendar-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
elementary-calendar.x86_64: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/my/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/cv/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings, 1 badness; has taken 1.2 s 




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: elementary-calendar-debuginfo-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.4.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmp1n27eqw9')]
checks: 31, packages: 1

 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 badness; has taken 0.4 s 





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts ============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
    /usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
    /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 4

elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary io.elementary.calendar
elementary-calendar-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
elementary-calendar.x86_64: E: invalid-lc-messages-dir /usr/share/locale/mo/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64@2/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg /usr/share/icons/hicolor/64x64/apps/io.elementary.calendar.svg
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/my/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/cv/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/kn/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/is/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
elementary-calendar.x86_64: W: files-duplicate /usr/share/locale/mn/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo /usr/share/locale/mg/LC_MESSAGES/io.elementary.calendar.mo
 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 11 warnings, 127 filtered, 1 badness; has taken 2.5 s 



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
elementary-calendar: /usr/lib64/io.elementary.calendar/plugins/CalDAV/libcaldav.so
elementary-calendar: /usr/lib64/io.elementary.calendar/plugins/Google/libgoogle.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/elementary/calendar/archive/7.0.0/calendar-7.0.0.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     : 389a46896b8cf883ef30cf60eab9edd397cfa38a2375164f833921b1ff72aefc
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 389a46896b8cf883ef30cf60eab9edd397cfa38a2375164f833921b1ff72aefc


Requires
--------
elementary-calendar (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    hicolor-icon-theme
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libchamplain-0.12.so.0()(64bit)
    libchamplain-gtk-0.12.so.0()(64bit)
    libclutter-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libclutter-gtk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libecal-2.0.so.2()(64bit)
    libedataserver-1.2.so.27()(64bit)
    libedataserverui-1.2.so.4()(64bit)
    libelementary-calendar.so.0()(64bit)
    libfolks.so.26()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgee-0.8.so.2()(64bit)
    libgeoclue-2.so.0()(64bit)
    libgeocode-glib-2.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgranite.so.6()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libhandy-1.so.0()(64bit)
    libhandy-1.so.0(LIBHANDY_1_0)(64bit)
    libical-glib.so.3()(64bit)
    libportal-gtk3.so.1()(64bit)
    libportal.so.1()(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

elementary-calendar-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    elementary-calendar(x86-64)
    libelementary-calendar.so.0()(64bit)
    pkgconfig(gee-0.8)
    pkgconfig(glib-2.0)
    pkgconfig(gmodule-2.0)
    pkgconfig(granite)
    pkgconfig(gtk+-3.0)
    pkgconfig(libecal-2.0)
    pkgconfig(libedataserver-1.2)
    pkgconfig(libedataserverui-1.2)
    pkgconfig(libical-glib)

elementary-calendar-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

elementary-calendar-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides
--------
elementary-calendar:
    application()
    application(io.elementary.calendar.desktop)
    elementary-calendar
    elementary-calendar(x86-64)
    libelementary-calendar.so.0()(64bit)
    metainfo()
    metainfo(io.elementary.calendar.metainfo.xml)
    mimehandler(text/calendar)

elementary-calendar-devel:
    elementary-calendar-devel
    elementary-calendar-devel(x86-64)
    pkgconfig(elementary-calendar)

elementary-calendar-debuginfo:
    debuginfo(build-id)
    elementary-calendar-debuginfo
    elementary-calendar-debuginfo(x86-64)
    libcaldav.so-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
    libelementary-calendar.so.0.1-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.debug()(64bit)
    libgoogle.so-7.0.0-1.fc40.x86_64.debug()(64bit)

elementary-calendar-debugsource:
    elementary-calendar-debugsource
    elementary-calendar-debugsource(x86-64)



Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 2251102
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Shell-api, Generic, C/C++
Disabled plugins: R, fonts, Python, Haskell, Ocaml, PHP, Java, SugarActivity, Perl
Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH

Comments:
a) Svg icons should go into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable
b) Builds on all architectures https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109417319
c) Package seems to have additional licenses:
*No copyright* GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
-------------------------------------------------------
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/EventStore.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Utils.vala

GNU General Public License v2.0 or later
----------------------------------------
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/DateIterator.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/DateRange.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/DateTime.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/ECalComponent.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/ICalComponent.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Services/Calendar/Util/ICalTime.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Tests/util-tests.vala

GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
----------------------------------------
calendar-7.0.0/core/GesturesUtils.vala
calendar-7.0.0/data/style/Grid.css
calendar-7.0.0/data/style/Header.css
calendar-7.0.0/data/style/WeekLabels.css
calendar-7.0.0/src/AgendaView.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Application.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/EventDialog.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/GuestGrid.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/GuestsPanel.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/InfoPanel.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/LocationPanel.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/ReminderPanel.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventEdition/RepeatPanel.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventParser/EventParser.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventParser/EventParserHandler.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventParser/ParsedEvent.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventParser/Parsers/ParserDe.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/EventParser/Parsers/ParserEn.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/CalendarView.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/EventButton.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/Grid.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/GridDay.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/Header.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/WeekLabels.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/ImportDialog.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/LanguagesFormat.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/MainWindow.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/SourceDialog/SourceDialog.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/TodayEventMonitor.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/AgendaEventRow.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/CalendarButton.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/CalendarChooser.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/CalendarRow.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/ConnectivityInfoBar.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/ContractorButtonWithMenu.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/DateSwitcher.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/DateTimePicker.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/DynamicSpinner.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/EventMenu.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/HeaderBar.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/SourcePopover.vala
calendar-7.0.0/src/Widgets/SourceRow.vala

GNU Lesser General Public License v2.1 or later
-----------------------------------------------
calendar-7.0.0/src/Grid/VAutoHider.vala

GNU Library General Public License v2 or later
----------------------------------------------
calendar-7.0.0/core/Backends/Backend.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Backends/BackendsManager.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Backends/LocalBackend.vala
calendar-7.0.0/core/Backends/PlacementWidget.vala
calendar-7.0.0/plugins/CalDAV/CalDAVBackend.vala
calendar-7.0.0/plugins/Google/GoogleBackend.vala

Comment 6 Fabio Valentini 2023-11-28 19:24:48 UTC
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #5)
> Comments:
> a) Svg icons should go into /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable

No, the image format has no bearing on where those icons should get installed.
Most elementary projects provide even the size-specific icons in SVG format instead of in a bitmap format.

> b) Builds on all architectures
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=109417319

> c) Package seems to have additional licenses:

Yes, the license tag already reflects this.
The license file provided by the project is for GPL-3.0, which is the "effective" license if you combine all these.

Comment 7 Benson Muite 2023-12-05 06:11:38 UTC
>> c) Package seems to have additional licenses:

>Yes, the license tag already reflects this.
>The license file provided by the project is for GPL-3.0, which is the "effective" license if you combine all these.

All relevant licenses in the compiled files need to be indicated. Please see:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/#_no_effective_license_analysis

Comment 8 Fabio Valentini 2023-12-05 10:53:35 UTC
(In reply to Benson Muite from comment #7)
> >> c) Package seems to have additional licenses:
> 
> >Yes, the license tag already reflects this.
> >The license file provided by the project is for GPL-3.0, which is the "effective" license if you combine all these.
> 
> All relevant licenses in the compiled files need to be indicated. Please see:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/license-field/
> #_no_effective_license_analysis

They are:
License:        GPL-3.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-or-later AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND LGPL-2.0-or-later

Comment 9 Benson Muite 2023-12-05 14:27:38 UTC
[fedora-review-service-build]

Comment 10 Fedora Review Service 2023-12-05 14:44:59 UTC
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/6726617
(succeeded)

Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-review-2251102-elementary-calendar/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/06726617-elementary-calendar/fedora-review/review.txt

Found issues:

- A package with this name already exists. Please check https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-calendar
  Read more: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_conflicting_package_names

Please know that there can be false-positives.

---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service

If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.

Comment 11 Benson Muite 2023-12-08 07:10:29 UTC
Same directory ownership issue as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2251096
otherwise seems ok.

Comment 12 Neal Gompa 2023-12-08 15:17:13 UTC
I think we can let that go, given that there's a bug with filesystem to fix it. Co-ownership of locale directories can wind up being problematic, so it's better to avoid it and just prod the filesystem maintainer to add the directories.

Comment 13 Benson Muite 2023-12-08 18:22:14 UTC
Ok. Approved.

Comment 14 Fabio Valentini 2023-12-13 14:56:51 UTC
Thank you!
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11833

Comment 15 Fabio Valentini 2023-12-18 14:07:34 UTC
Imported and built:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-046418b8e0


Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.