Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 228473 - Review Request: hunspell-es - Spanish hunspell dictionaries
Summary: Review Request: hunspell-es - Spanish hunspell dictionaries
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: manuel wolfshant
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FE-ACCEPT
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2007-02-13 09:50 UTC by Caolan McNamara
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2007-02-14 10:28:36 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:
wolfy: fedora-review+
notting: fedora-cvs+

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 09:50:38 UTC 
Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-es.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/caolanm/hunspell/hunspell-es-0.20050510-1.src.rpm
Description: Spanish hunspell dictionaries


Similar to 227811
Comment 1 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-13 13:59:20 UTC 
GOOD

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines 
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream , sha1sum 
3801efb6d6252e40a743a913afc4f86bb8d3a3ef  es_ES.zip
4cc6bd6f5985d876f6d1bb565051b8131ddb82e4  es_MX.zip
- the package builds in mock for devel/x86_64, generates a noarch (which is
consistent with the fact that basically it includes only text files)
- the license LGPL stated in the tag is the same as the one included in the
source and is included in the package
- there are only 2 files (word lists) + a short doc with instructions and
license clearance, so no need for -doc and no .la, .pc, static files
- no missing BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all files/directories that it creates, does not take ownership of other
files/dirs
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- rpmlint output is silent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs as the only doc are just the LGPL licenses (localised for
Spain and Mexico)
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

APPROVED

PS: You could also add support for es_BZ (Belize), es_CU (Cuba), es_GU (Guatemala)
Please bug upstream to update the corresponding Readme files on
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/,
over there the license is stated to be GPL and not LGPL as the ones included in
the zip files.
Comment 2 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 14:44:39 UTC 
Guatemala is es_GT I believe not es_GU and es_GT is one of the aliases already

es_BZ, es_CU and es_GU don't appear in locale -a | grep es_ and they don't
appear in the drop down of spanish languages in openoffice.org's
format->character->font->language
Comment 3 manuel wolfshant 2007-02-13 15:06:54 UTC 
All those I have mentioned are listed as such at
http://ftp.services.openoffice.org/pub/OpenOffice.org/contrib/dictionaries/README_es_ES.txt,
under "Los siguientes son disponibles:" (The following are available)
Comment 4 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-13 15:17:16 UTC 
Interesting, I'd say the GU is a typo, unless it's an older unofficial locale
replaced with GT. The other ones don't *seem* to be official locales yet, so
aren't in glibc or OOo. I think I'll leave them out, easier to add them later in
than have to pull them for conflicting with a future allocated locale.
Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2007-02-14 10:28:36 UTC 
 27548 (hunspell-es): Build on target fedora-development-extras succeeded.
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.