1] use global instead of define

2] summary should not start with name of application/library and there is missing subject of that sentence. 
better summary would be "Library for ..." and specifying what this library does.
does it parse csv files? or ... ?

3]
%if 0%{?rhel}%{?fedora} > 5
Requires:	ruby(abi) = %{ruby_abiver}
%endif

it has to require ruby(abi) = 1.8 otherwise it conflict with ruby packaging guidelines
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Ruby

4] multiple listed files
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/AUTHORS
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/CHANGELOG
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/COPYING
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/LICENSE
warning: File listed twice: /usr/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/fastercsv-1.5.0/README

Will correct 1/2/3/4, you're right. But given that 1 is a dumb Fedora decision,
which makes no sense from the rpm-only point of view.

Anything else I could correct as well? I don't want to provide a new *.src.rpm
for every possible tiny future change - thank you.

Some notes

- LICENSE text says this is "GPLv2 or Ruby"
- As gem file contains test/ directory, add %check section
  and execute some tests.

By the way the comments 3] and 4] in comment 1 is blockers .

Thank you both so far, I hopefully addressed all mentioned issues now:

Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-fastercsv.spec
SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.src.rpm

1] 
license:
there is setup.rb which is LGPL
reflect it in spec file with appropriate comment
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios

*rpmlint ok
*ruby guidelines ok
*legible & english spec file
*naming ok
*directory ownage & files section ok
*clean/install section & macros ok
*utf-8 ok

conclusion: License needs to be corrected, otherwise it looks ok

(In reply to comment #5)
> 1] 
> license:
> there is setup.rb which is LGPL

I don't think we should consider the license of setup.rb
( like that we usually does not consider the license of
  Makefile, configure )
Anyway "GPLv2 or Ruby" is stricter than LGPLv2 so this
can be ignored anyway.

As this is clarified now, anything else?

approved

Jan, thank you for the review.


New Package CVS Request
=======================
Package Name: rubygem-fastercsv
Short Description: Faster, smaller and cleaner replacement to standard CSV library
Owners: robert
Branches: EL-5 F-10 F-11
InitialCC:

cvs done.

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 11.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 10.
http://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10

Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 Tag: dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert
Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 Tag: dist-f10-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert
Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 Tag: dist-f11-updates-candidate Status: complete Built by: robert
Package: rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc12 Tag: dist-f12 Status: complete Built by: robert

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc10 has been pushed to the Fedora 10 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.fc11 has been pushed to the Fedora 11 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

rubygem-fastercsv-1.5.0-2.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.