As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list,
dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews,
so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora.

To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib
package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package
review.  It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then
to add the toplevel program to the tracker.

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-dlist-0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm

http://narasim.fedorapeople.org/package_reviews/ghc-dlist.spec

rpmlint -i ghc-dlist.spec ~/rpmbuild/SRPMS/ghc-dlist-0.5-2.fc14.src.rpm ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/i686/ghc-dlist-*.rpm
ghc-dlist-prof.i686: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
Your package has a dependency on a devel package but it's not a devel package
itself.

ghc-dlist-prof.i686: W: no-documentation
The package contains no documentation (README, doc, etc). You have to include
documentation files.

ghc-dlist-prof.i686: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/ghc-6.12.3/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
A development file (usually source code) is located in a non-devel package. If
you want to include source code in your package, be sure to create a
development package.

4 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

Looks just fine to me.  Here is the review:

 +:ok, NA: not applicable

MUST Items:
[+] MUST: rpmlint output

ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: E: devel-dependency ghc-dlist-devel
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: no-documentation
ghc-dlist-prof.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/ghc-6.12.3/dlist-0.5/libHSdlist-0.5_p.a
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings.

These can be waived and will be fixed by coming ghc-rpm-macros-0.13
which merges -prof to -devel.

[+] MUST: Package Naming Guidelines
[+] MUST: spec file name must match base package %{name}
[+] MUST: Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: Licensing Guidelines
[+] MUST: License field in the package spec file must match actual license.
[+] MUST: include license files in %doc if available in source
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English and be legible.
[+] MUST: source md5sum matches upstream release

54f6c18ff689b7ef54e3229dc4a94107  dlist-0.5.tar.gz

[+] MUST: must successfully compile and build into binary rpms on one main arch

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3072682

[+] MUST: if necessary use ExcludeArch for other archs
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires
[NA] MUST: use %find_lang macro for .po translations
[NA] MUST: packages which store shared library files in the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[NA] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates.
[+] MUST: A package must not contain any duplicate files in the %files listing.
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Every %files section must include a %defattr(...) line.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros, as described in the macros section of Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[NA] MUST: Large documentation files should go in a doc subpackage.
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of the application.
[+] MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package.
[NA] MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[NA] MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in
a -devel package.
[+] MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency
[+] MUST: Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these should be removed in the spec.
[NA] MUST: Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section.
[+] MUST: Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
[+] MUST: All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.

SHOULD Items:
[+] SHOULD: The reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[+] SHOULD: The package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures.
[+] SHOULD: If scriptlets are used, those scriptlets must be sane.

Package is APPROVED.

Created attachment 499008 [details]
ghc-dlist.spec-1.patch

I suggest making these minor changes to improve the package
and bring it closer to later cabal2spec.

Thanks for the review.

>I suggest making these minor changes to improve the package 
>and bring it closer to later cabal2spec.
Yes,  I will do it.

New Package SCM Request
=======================
Package Name: ghc-dlist
Short Description:  Haskell package that provides difference lists
Owners: narasim
Branches: f13 f14 f15
InitialCC: haskell-sig

Git done (by process-git-requests).

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 13.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc15

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 testing repository.

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository.

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.

ghc-dlist-0.5-3.fc13 has been pushed to the Fedora 13 stable repository.

Also need dlist for pandoc/el6.


Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: ghc-dlist
New Branches: el6
Owners: narasim petersen
InitialCC: haskell-sig

(actually it is needed now for snap-core and wai-extra)

Git done (by process-git-requests).

ghc-dlist-0.5-6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-dlist-0.5-6.el6

ghc-dlist-0.5-6.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.