Yes, there's a missing dependency, im taking care of it, meanwhile work around it:

gem install rhc-rest

The missing dep where not listed in rhc-0.88.9.gemspec at all, it appeared at newest version 0.90.7.

Afaik, with the next release after 0.90.7, more or less in a week or two they are pulling rhc-rest back into the main rhc so we will wait and make no changes untill then since it will take longer to package rhc-rest and include it in Fedora.

Thanks for reporting

*** Bug 816760 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

The rhc 0.91.12 ruby gem  has been published.  The rhc-rest dependancy was pulled back into the gem, so it should have the same dependancies as before.
Try it again with the newer version.

(In reply to comment #3)
> The rhc 0.91.12 ruby gem  has been published.  The rhc-rest dependancy was
> pulled back into the gem, so it should have the same dependancies as before.
> Try it again with the newer version.

Is there a src.rpm package somewhere?

http://gomix.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-rhc/rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-1.fc17.src.rpm

I will finish it as as i can.

I don't understand what's the problem, but the testing result lead to the exactly same fail as before:

wycliff:coelodonta (master) $ rpm -q rubygem-rhc
rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-1.el7.noarch
wycliff:coelodonta (master) $ gem list --local
*** LOCAL GEMS ***

bundler (1.0.18)
ditz (0.5)
gash (0.1.3)
git (1.2.5)
gli (1.3.2, 1.2.5, 1.1.1)
grancher (0.1.5)
io-console (0.3)
jeweler (1.6.4)
json (1.7.0, 1.5.3)
json_pure (1.6.3)
minitest (2.10.1)
open4 (1.1.0, 0.9.6)
parseconfig (0.5.2)
rainbow (1.1.1, 1.1)
rake (0.9.2.2, 0.9.2)
rdoc (3.9.4, 3.9.3, 3.9.2)
rhc (0.91.12)
sdoc (0.3.1)
svn2git (2.1.0, 2.0.0)
test-unit (2.4.8)
TicGit-ng (1.0.2.9, 1.0.1)
trac4r (1.2.4, 1.2.3)
trollop (1.16.2)
wycliff:coelodonta (master) $ rhc-chk -h
/usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/dependency.rb:247:in `to_specs': Could not find rest-client (>= 0) amongst [TicGit-ng-1.0.2.9, TicGit-ng-1.0.1, bundler-1.0.18, ditz-0.5, gash-0.1.3, git-1.2.5, gli-1.3.2, gli-1.2.5, gli-1.1.1, grancher-0.1.5, io-console-0.3, jeweler-1.6.4, json-1.7.0, json-1.5.3, json_pure-1.6.3, minitest-2.10.1, open4-1.1.0, open4-0.9.6, parseconfig-0.5.2, rainbow-1.1.1, rainbow-1.1, rake-0.9.2.2, rake-0.9.2, rdoc-3.9.4, rdoc-3.9.3, rdoc-3.9.2, rhc-0.91.12, sdoc-0.3.1, svn2git-2.1.0, svn2git-2.0.0, test-unit-2.4.8, trac4r-1.2.4, trac4r-1.2.3, trollop-1.16.2] (Gem::LoadError)
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:777:in `block in activate_dependencies'
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:766:in `each'
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:766:in `activate_dependencies'
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/specification.rb:750:in `activate'
	from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems.rb:1232:in `gem'
	from /usr/bin/rhc-chk:22:in `<main>'
wycliff:coelodonta (master) $

That's because is not finished, from the top of my mind, i think rubygem-rest-client is missing (new dep).

rawhide, f14, f15, f16 updates pushed.

Please test el6 version from an scratch-build 

* http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4040188

(In reply to comment #8)
> rawhide, f14, f15, f16 updates pushed.
> 
> Please test el6 version from an scratch-build 
> 
> * http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4040188

How can I test it without rubygem-rest-client (which has not been packaged yet, right)?

There was a typo in his requires.  rubygem-rest-client has been in all the releases for a while I believe.

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=9969

rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6

*** Bug 818217 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Is there any particular reason why you hard-code this requirement

Requires:      ruby(abi) = 1.8

I am trying to make this build on a distro where we have already ruby 1.9. With eliminating this line, it seems to work just fine:

wycliff:coelodonta (master) $ rhc-chk -l login -p secret 
/home/matej/.gem/gems/rhc-0.91.12/bin/rhc-chk:108: Use RbConfig instead of obsolete and deprecated Config.
Loaded suite /usr/bin/rhc-chk
Started
.......

Finished in 12.816356885 seconds.

7 tests, 23 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors, 0 pendings, 0 omissions, 0 notifications
100% passed

0.55 tests/s, 1.79 assertions/s
wycliff:coelodonta (master) $ 

(what's that about RbConfig?)

Package rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5755/rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

Not sure if you want/need bugs against F17b Live, but following openshift install steps published on the web  (https://openshift.redhat.com/app/getting_started ) doesn't work.  I had to yum erase rhc and yum install rubygem-rhc.

(In reply to comment #16)
> Not sure if you want/need bugs against F17b Live, but following openshift
> install steps published on the web
> (https://openshift.redhat.com/app/getting_started ) doesn't work.  I had to yum
> erase rhc and yum install rubygem-rhc.

F17b Live will certainly have too old packages. Install package from above shown URL on admin.fedoraproject.org.

$ rpm -ql rubygem-rhc|grep -c $HOME
251
$ 

I am sorry, but this is completely unacceptable ... Fedora package has no business to push any files in users $HOME. Please install those files according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Ruby#Build_Architecture_and_File_Placement somewhere to %{_datadir} or something.

Please do a sanity check, like "echo $HOME" or do a "rpm -ql rubygem-rhc" before posting a bug like this.

$ rpm -ql rubygem-rhc | wc -l
300
$ rpm -ql rubygem-rhc | grep -c /usr/lib/ruby/
286
$ rpm -ql rubygem-rhc | grep -c /usr/bin/
14
$ rpm -ql rubygem-rhc|grep -c $HOME
0
$

As you can see (which you would see if you didn't do the grep) there are 300 files.  286 of them are in /usr/lib/ruby, the rest are in /usr/bin

I've tested this on the EPEL6, Fedora 17, and Fedora 16, all with the same results.

I don't know where you got your rubygem-rhc, but it isn't the one from Fedora or EPEL.

(In reply to comment #19)
> I don't know where you got your rubygem-rhc, but it isn't the one from Fedora
> or EPEL.

Rebuilt of F17 -2 package, -3 works well.

rubygem-rhc-0.91.12-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.