Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 996395 - gcc-4.8.1-5.fc20 is FTBFS
Summary: gcc-4.8.1-5.fc20 is FTBFS
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: binutils
Version: 20
Hardware: s390x
OS: Unspecified
urgent
urgent
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nick Clifton
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: ZedoraTracker
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2013-08-13 06:29 UTC by Dan Horák
Modified: 2013-09-18 10:22 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version: binutils-2.23.88.0.1-12.fc20
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2013-09-18 10:22:50 UTC
Type: Bug
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Dan Horák 2013-08-13 06:29:01 UTC 
libitm fails to compile because -march=zEC12 option is used for assembler

...
libtool: compile:  /builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/./gcc/xg++ -B/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/./gcc/ -nostdinc++ -nostdinc++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/s390-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/include/s390-redhat-linux -I/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/s390-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/include -I/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -I/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/libstdc++-v3/include/backward -I/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/s390-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src -L/builddir/build/BUILD/gcc-4.8.1-20130717/obj-s390-redhat-linux/s390-redhat-linux/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -B/usr/s390-redhat-linux/bin/ -B/usr/s390-redhat-linux/lib/ -isystem /usr/s390-redhat-linux/include -isystem /usr/s390-redhat-linux/sys-include -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../libitm -I../../../libitm/config/linux/s390 -I../../../libitm/config/linux -I../../../libitm/config/s390 -I../../../libitm/config/posix -I../../../libitm/config/generic -I../../../libitm -ftls-model=initial-exec -mzarch -mhtm -Wa,-march=zEC12 -Wall -pthread -Werror -std=gnu++0x -funwind-tables -fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fabi-version=4 -O2 -g -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -march=z9-109 -mtune=z10 -D_GNU_SOURCE -MT aatree.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/aatree.Tpo -c ../../../libitm/aatree.cc  -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/aatree.o
Assembler messages:
Error: invalid switch -march=zEC12
Error: unrecognized option -march=zEC12
...

full log is available from http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1135021

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
gcc-4.8.1-5.fc20
binutils-2.23.88.0.1-8.fc20
Comment 1 Dan Horák 2013-08-13 17:50:40 UTC 
Nick, please see Jakub's response on IRC

<jakub> dhorak: sounds like a binutils issue
<jakub> dhorak: unlike el7 or f19, the f20 binutils aren't based on hjl's releases and thus are significantly older than what f19 or el7 has
<jakub> dhorak: you need to bug binutils maintainers to backport the needed changes
Comment 2 Jakub Jelinek 2013-08-13 17:56:09 UTC 
power8 support is missing in f20 too I think, don't know what is the AVX 3.1 state.
Comment 3 Dan Horák 2013-08-13 18:03:33 UTC 
Jakub, should I expect any problem when binutils-2.23.52.0.1-10.fc20 will be used to build gcc? Older, but from the Linux branch.
Comment 4 Nick Clifton 2013-08-14 11:03:50 UTC 
binutils-2.23.88.0.1-12.fc20 should fix this.

Cheers
  Nick
Comment 5 Jeff Law 2013-08-19 15:54:39 UTC 
Just to clarify, F20 isn't "significantly older", and we made a conscious decision to get away from the HJ releases and instead base Fedora (and ultimately RHEL) on the upstream binutils releases.

We expected some problems from this transition, particularly on the lesser tested platforms.

It looks like Nick already took care of this instance.  Please feel free to contact either of us if there are additional issues.
Comment 6 Fedora End Of Life 2013-09-16 16:54:04 UTC 
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 20 development cycle.
Changing version to '20'.

More information and reason for this action is here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping/Fedora20
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.