Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 100925

Summary: Should kudzu really run with a 30 second timeout if rhgb prevents user from providing feedback?
Product: [Retired] Red Hat Linux Beta Reporter: George Karabin <gkarabin>
Component: kudzuAssignee: Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: beta1CC: mitr, redhatbugs, rvokal, tilmann
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2003-10-08 17:31:23 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 100643    

Description George Karabin 2003-07-27 06:44:36 UTC
While trying to debug Bug #58201 a little bit, I'm coming to this question:

Should /etc/rc.d/init.d/kudzu really run with the '-t 30' argument when rhgb is
part of the boot process? If I understand this proprerly, rhgb (appears to)
prevent a user from providing any feedback during boot.

Wouldn't the '-q' argument be more appropriate than the timeout, so that kudzu
can run and do something useful? I don't see anything in hwconf.c to make it
clear why kudzu wouldn't always timeout in this case.

Am I missing something here? I feel like I must, because if I were right, I
would expect a timeout to occur every time kudzu runs during the initscripts,
and then I'd expect to see a record of it via the "initlog" function call from
/etc/rc.d/init.d/kudzu, which I'm not. Still, better to ask than not, since
sometimes rhgb seems to sit a while without updating its progress bar. Things
were pretty snappy on my last reboot though - I wonder if this has something to
do with the push I gave kudzu when looking at Bug #58021?

Comment 1 George Karabin 2003-07-27 06:45:59 UTC
Oops - I meant Bug #58021...


Comment 2 Bill Nottingham 2003-07-28 01:14:49 UTC
Actually, the plan is to have GUI windows from kudzu pop up.

Comment 3 George Karabin 2003-07-28 06:54:35 UTC
Ah, cool. Is anything in CVS? I took a look at the pserver access on rhl and
didn't see anything obvious, at least not on the head branch.


Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2003-07-28 16:08:16 UTC
Nope, no code in CVS yet.

Comment 5 Bill Nottingham 2003-08-04 18:52:38 UTC
*** Bug 101602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 6 Jonathan Blandford 2003-10-08 17:31:23 UTC
It's there now.  I'm not really happy w/ the kudzu screen, but it'll do until we
rework kudzu.