Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 105825
Summary: | HWADDR/nameif broken with NETWORKING_IPV6=yes | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dax Kelson <dkelson> |
Component: | initscripts | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | QA Contact: | Brock Organ <borgan> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | alex, pekkas, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-05-05 20:30:37 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 100644 |
Description
Dax Kelson
2003-09-28 05:33:21 UTC
I forgot to mention that my ifcfg-ethX files all have appropriate HWADDR lines. Hm, ok. Does it fail only with 'service network start', or also with just bringing the interface up by hand? 'sh -x ifup <whatever>' in that case would be nice. It seems to fail in both cases. It is 100% reproducible here. service network start ifup eth3 However, using sh -x isn't trivial since this is a PCMCIA nic and when I physical insert the nic, the ifup is run automatically via hotplug. I'll go hack on hotplug not to bring it up automatically and get your debug for you. Another (maybe related??) oddity is that my NICs have link-local IPv6 addresses even when I don't have NETWORKING_IPV6=yes. I can file a bug on this if you wish. Regardless, HWADDR/nameif works works without NETWORKING_IPV6, and doesn't work with it. Hi Dax, I've just submited bug report for IPv6 addresses assigned regardless of NETWORKING_IPV6 setting. Than I found your bug report. I guess this two bugs might be related, on the other hand, maybe they are not. Out of curiousity, does this work at all differently with FC2? FWIW.. I don't really understand the logic of nameif, and you'll probably face problems if you want to name them ethX (where ethX might already exist).. I guess the fundamental issue here is that nameif only works under certain circumstances (not sure which exactly, the device must not be UP at least -- else it gives 'Device or resource busy'). So, my guess would be that loading the IPv6 module somehow interferes with that. For example when v6 link-local addresses are configured (automatically), the interface can no longer be re-named (not sure, not checked) ? If that theory is correct then: 1) when run through 'service network start', init.ipv6-global gets called before IPv4 has been activated, and it loads up IPv6, which gets immediately activated when the interface is brought up 2) when running 'ifup eth3' or the like, IPv6 has already been loaded through another interface, 'jamming' eth3 right after the network driver has been loaded but IPv4 addresses haven't been configured yet. If I'd have to guess, I'd guess that nameif doesn't work when v6 link-local addresses have been configured on the interface. Then I'd investigate whether it would be possible to make it work, because disabling the link-local addresses is practically not doable. Does this still happen with FC3? Closing due to lack of response. If this still occurs in FC4 or FC5, please reopen. |