Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 119203

Summary: patch: stop whining about missing MemShared in /proc/meminfo with kernel 2.6
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Kaj J. Niemi <kajtzu>
Component: net-snmpAssignee: Phil Knirsch <pknirsch>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: rvokal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-04-08 15:10:49 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 114963    
Attachments:
Description Flags
oneliner commenting out unnecessary logging none

Description Kaj J. Niemi 2004-03-26 11:28:51 UTC 
Description of problem:
There is not a line starting MemShared reading /proc/meminfo with
kernel 2.6 anymore. It looks like on 2.4 it has usually had the value
of zero (0) if it existed. 

Mar 26 13:27:47 quux snmpd[678]: No MemShared line in /proc/meminfo
Mar 26 13:28:05 quux last message repeated 14 times
Mar 26 13:29:17 quux last message repeated 40 times
Mar 26 13:30:30 quux snmpd[678]: No MemShared line in /proc/meminfo

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.1.1

Additional info:
Attached patch prevents net-snmp from unnecessarily complaining about
the fact. Oneliner, really.

Thanks.
Comment 1 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-03-26 11:29:17 UTC 
Created attachment 98879 [details]
oneliner commenting out unnecessary logging
Comment 2 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-04-06 17:05:54 UTC 
It would be good if this made FC2. :)
Comment 3 Phil Knirsch 2004-04-08 15:10:49 UTC 
Yeah, looks reasonable, too.

Will be included in next build, as usual. :-)

Read ya, Phil