Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 119203 - patch: stop whining about missing MemShared in /proc/meminfo with kernel 2.6
Summary: patch: stop whining about missing MemShared in /proc/meminfo with kernel 2.6
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: net-snmp
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Phil Knirsch
QA Contact:
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: FC2Target
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2004-03-26 11:28 UTC by Kaj J. Niemi
Modified: 2015-03-05 01:13 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2004-04-08 15:10:49 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
oneliner commenting out unnecessary logging (deleted)
2004-03-26 11:29 UTC, Kaj J. Niemi 		no flags Details | Diff
View All

Description Kaj J. Niemi 2004-03-26 11:28:51 UTC 
Description of problem:
There is not a line starting MemShared reading /proc/meminfo with
kernel 2.6 anymore. It looks like on 2.4 it has usually had the value
of zero (0) if it existed. 

Mar 26 13:27:47 quux snmpd[678]: No MemShared line in /proc/meminfo
Mar 26 13:28:05 quux last message repeated 14 times
Mar 26 13:29:17 quux last message repeated 40 times
Mar 26 13:30:30 quux snmpd[678]: No MemShared line in /proc/meminfo

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
net-snmp-5.1.1

Additional info:
Attached patch prevents net-snmp from unnecessarily complaining about
the fact. Oneliner, really.

Thanks.
Comment 1 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-03-26 11:29:17 UTC 
Created attachment 98879 [details]
oneliner commenting out unnecessary logging
Comment 2 Kaj J. Niemi 2004-04-06 17:05:54 UTC 
It would be good if this made FC2. :)
Comment 3 Phil Knirsch 2004-04-08 15:10:49 UTC 
Yeah, looks reasonable, too.

Will be included in next build, as usual. :-)

Read ya, Phil
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.