Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1256091
Summary: | Review Request: ghc-http-conduit - HTTP client package with conduit interface and HTTPS support | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ben Boeckel <fedora> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dshea, haskell-devel, package-review, quantum.analyst, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2017-09-27 17:59:38 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1256090, 1496285 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1096609, 1176888 |
Description
Ben Boeckel
2015-08-23 21:42:34 UTC
Spec URL is 404'ing. Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit.spec SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit-2.1.10-1.fc25.src.rpm Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit-2.1.10-1.fc25.src.rpm Spec is outdated. Ben, this is blocking the update of git-annex. That update required many new deps, and this is one of the last remaining. So this has high priority now :) Closing in favour of new review. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1496543 *** |