Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1256090 - Review Request: ghc-http-client-tls - Http-client backend using the connection package and tls library
Summary: Review Request: ghc-http-client-tls - Http-client backend using the connectio...
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE of bug 1496285
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
medium
medium
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On: 1256073 1256089 1485762 1495476
Blocks: 1256091
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2015-08-23 21:37 UTC by Ben Boeckel
Modified: 2017-09-26 23:39 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-09-26 23:39:23 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ben Boeckel 2015-08-23 21:37:34 UTC 
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls-0.2.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description:
Intended for use by higher-level libraries, such as http-conduit.

Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf
Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/mathstuf/git-annex/
Comment 1 Ben Boeckel 2016-04-23 17:19:06 UTC 
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls-0.2.4-1.fc25.src.rpm
Comment 2 Roman Joost 2017-03-01 01:05:43 UTC 
Can't review :-( The Spec and SRPM URLs are giving a 404.
Comment 3 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-08-24 02:52:07 UTC 
Still 404 and also is outdated.
Comment 4 Elliott Sales de Andrade 2017-09-26 23:39:23 UTC 
Closing in favour of new review.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1496285 ***
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.