Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1273927 (qtcurve)
Summary: | Review Request: qtcurve - A set of widget styles for GTK+ and Qt widget toolkits | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Rex Dieter <rdieter> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Raphael Groner <projects.rg> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | kevin, package-review, projects.rg |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | projects.rg:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2015-11-11 17:45:48 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 928937 |
Description
Rex Dieter
2015-10-21 13:59:22 UTC
rdieter's scratch build of qtcurve-1.8.18-1.fc20.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11534309 I do not find any blocker. APPROVED Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines => Ignore, fedora-review tries to install the debuginfo package twice, dnf is unable to handle that. ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. => Okay, those binaries are the theme engines. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD", "BSD (2 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) LGPL (v2.1 or v3)", "LGPL (v2.1 or v3)", "Unknown or generated". 95 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/builder /fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/licensecheck.txt => Looks okay to me with "LGPLv2 or LGPLv3" as KDE e.V. wishes. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. => Please retire separate legacy package qtcurve-gtk2 (as well as qtcurve-kde4). [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. => Package qtcurve-kde4 must be retired. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 5 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Perl: [-]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires and Requires:. Note: Requires: perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_%(eval "`%{__perl} -V:version`"; echo $version)) missing? => Perl script is meant for KDE4 that's not relevant any more for Fedora. ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in qtcurve- libs , qtcurve-gtk2 , qtcurve-qt4 , qtcurve-debuginfo => Ignore, qtcurve is meant as meta-package. [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass. => Please consider to execute those test/ files. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: Mock build failed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#rpmlint [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. Installation errors ------------------- INFO: mock.py version 1.2.13 starting (python version = 3.4.3)... Start: init plugins INFO: selinux enabled Finish: init plugins Start: run Start: chroot init INFO: calling preinit hooks INFO: enabled root cache INFO: enabled dnf cache Start: cleaning dnf metadata Finish: cleaning dnf metadata INFO: enabled ccache Mock Version: 1.2.13 INFO: Mock Version: 1.2.13 Finish: chroot init INFO: installing package(s): /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-libs-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-gtk2-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-qt4-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-debuginfo-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-debuginfo-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm ERROR: Command failed. See logs for output. # /usr/bin/dnf --installroot /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/ --releasever 24 install /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-libs-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-gtk2-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-qt4-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-debuginfo-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm /home/builder/fedora-review/1273927-qtcurve/results/qtcurve-debuginfo-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm --setopt=tsflags=nocontexts Rpmlint ------- Checking: qtcurve-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm qtcurve-libs-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm qtcurve-gtk2-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm qtcurve-qt4-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm qtcurve-debuginfo-1.8.18-1.fc24.x86_64.rpm qtcurve-1.8.18-1.fc24.src.rpm qtcurve.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) toolkits -> toolkit, tool kits, tool-kits qtcurve.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolkits -> toolkit, tool kits, tool-kits qtcurve.x86_64: E: no-binary => Ignore, qtcurve is meant as meta-package. qtcurve.x86_64: W: no-documentation qtcurve-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment qtcurve-libs.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Runtime -> Run time, Run-time, Rudiment qtcurve-gtk2.x86_64: W: no-documentation qtcurve-gtk2.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/themes/QtCurve/gtk-2.0/map_kde_icons.pl 644 /usr/bin/env => Ignore, KDE4 shouldn't be relevant any more. qtcurve-qt4.x86_64: W: obsolete-not-provided qtcurve-kde4 => Ignore, KDE4 shouldn't be relevant any more. qtcurve-qt4.x86_64: W: no-documentation qtcurve-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qtcurve-1.8.18/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.cmake_utils_base qtcurve-debuginfo.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/src/debug/qtcurve-1.8.18/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu/.cmake_utils_base qtcurve.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) toolkits -> toolkit, tool kits, tool-kits qtcurve.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US toolkits -> toolkit, tool kits, tool-kits qtcurve.src:2: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 2, tab: line 1) 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings. Requires -------- qtcurve-qt4 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): libQtCore.so.4()(64bit) libQtDBus.so.4()(64bit) libQtGui.so.4()(64bit) libQtSvg.so.4()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1()(64bit) libgcc_s.so.1(GCC_3.0)(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libqtcurve-utils.so.1()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6()(64bit) libstdc++.so.6(CXXABI_1.3)(64bit) qtcurve-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) qtcurve (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): qtcurve-gtk2(x86-64) qtcurve-qt4(x86-64) qtcurve-libs (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libX11-xcb.so.1()(64bit) libX11.so.6()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libdl.so.2()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpthread.so.0()(64bit) librt.so.1()(64bit) libxcb.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) qtcurve-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): qtcurve-gtk2 (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): /sbin/ldconfig libc.so.6()(64bit) libcairo.so.2()(64bit) libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit) libqtcurve-cairo.so.0()(64bit) libqtcurve-utils.so.1()(64bit) qtcurve-libs(x86-64) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- qtcurve-qt4: qtcurve-qt4 qtcurve-qt4(x86-64) qtcurve: qtcurve qtcurve(x86-64) qtcurve-libs: libqtcurve-utils.so.1()(64bit) qtcurve-libs qtcurve-libs(x86-64) qtcurve-debuginfo: qtcurve-debuginfo qtcurve-debuginfo(x86-64) qtcurve-gtk2: libqtcurve-cairo.so.0()(64bit) libqtcurve.so()(64bit) qtcurve-gtk2 qtcurve-gtk2(x86-64) Unversioned so-files -------------------- qtcurve-gtk2: /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/engines/libqtcurve.so qtcurve-qt4: /usr/lib64/qt4/plugins/styles/qtcurve.so Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/QtCurve/qtcurve/archive/1.8.18.tar.gz#/qtcurve-1.8.18.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 85997c9fa4a948945d719342f5993486aecf189d176408280bad9af8600873a6 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 85997c9fa4a948945d719342f5993486aecf189d176408280bad9af8600873a6 Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -v -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1273927 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++, Perl Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Haskell, R, PHP, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 in f22/f23 stable updates now, thanks. Now, I can see both qtcurve-gtk2 and qtcurve-kde4 orphaned in rawhide. Is there a need to orphan in f23 and also in f22, too because we've packages wtih names in conflict here? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Conflicts I don't think that's desirable |