Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1307345
| Summary: | bfast: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||||
| Component: | bfast | Assignee: | Adam Huffman <bloch> | ||||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Version: | 24 | CC: | bloch, rc040203, yselkowi | ||||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2016-03-23 11:44:40 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1305208 | ||||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||||
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2016-02-13 21:04:15 UTC
Created attachment 1124105 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 1124106 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 1124107 [details]
state.log
Created attachment 1128409 [details]
Patch to fix the FTBFS
Trigger of this FTFBS is this package is still relying on gnu89-inlining.
As this feature change was added to GCC-5, I wonder why this wasn't caught during the gcc-5 mass-rebuilt and didn't trigger an F23FTBFS. I assume it actually triggered an F23FTBFS (f23 still ships an f22 package), but the related BZ (RHBZ#1239386) seemingly was prematurely closed.
Anyway, the patch from the attachment should fix this issue and more related issues this package has and bring it back on track.
Unless somebody objects, I will apply this patch to rawhide and f23 in near future.
verdurin's bfast-0.7.0a-14.fc24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=736899 This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 24 development cycle. Changing version to '24'. More information and reason for this action is here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/HouseKeeping/Fedora24#Rawhide_Rebase Shouldn't that be: "CFLAGS=%optflags -fgnu89-inline" %configure (In reply to Yaakov Selkowitz from comment #7) > "CFLAGS=%optflags -fgnu89-inline" > %configure Well, it should not matter. In %build, modern rpm first exports CFLAGS, which is where it later is picked up by %configure: Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.e1SA4N + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + cd bfast-0.7.0a + CFLAGS='-O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -specs=/usr/lib/r + export CFLAGS ... + ./configure ... ... But you are right, %optflags would have been an alternative. @verdurin: Provided you applied this patch and rebuilt this package, please assign this BZ to you and close this BZ. Why wasn't this BZ closed? Closing |