Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 1362491

Summary: Review Request: phabricator - Phabricator, an open software engineering platform
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeroen van Meeuwen <vanmeeuwen+fedora>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody>
Status: CLOSED NOTABUG QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: bob, esm, jsmith.fedora, kparal, package-review, pasik, puiterwijk, tflink, zebob.m
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-08-10 00:55:45 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On: 1362487, 1362490    
Bug Blocks: 201449    

Description Jeroen van Meeuwen 2016-08-02 11:07:18 UTC
Spec URL:
Description: Phabricator is a collection of open source web applications that help software companies build better software.
Fedora Account System Username: kanarip

Comment 1 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2016-08-02 11:10:43 UTC
Please note that this package may need a bunch of work, including but not limited to the items already collected through analysis from Tim.

Comment 2 Jeroen van Meeuwen 2016-08-10 11:04:49 UTC
To show my general plan for unbundling software; strip the feature if you can (twilio, stripe, amazon-ses), use the packaged versions where appropriate (figlet, pear-figlet), package the software where appropriate (not yet started).

Spec URL:

Comment 5 Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 2017-10-05 15:41:46 UTC

I'm not familiar with EPEL requirements, so ignore the things not applying to it.

 - Not needed in Fedora:

   + Group:

   + rm -rf %{buildroot} in %install

   + %clean
     rm -rf %{buildroot}

   + %{!?_licensedir:%global license %doc}


 - Maybe you should refresh to a more recent git revision.

 - Use systemd macros, use:

BuildRequires: systemd

   instead of:

Requires(post):     systemd-units
Requires(postun):   systemd-units
Requires(preun):    systemd-units

BuildRequires:      systemd

 - You should probably clean up all the commented out part.

 - The release tag should start with 0.1 and so on:

Version:            0.1.%{revision_date}.git%{git_short_version_hash}

Comment 6 Package Review 2020-07-10 00:55:03 UTC
This is an automatic check from review-stats script.

This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry
it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software
into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the

You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version
available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase
chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you
need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at

Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned
and will be closed.
Thank you for your patience.

Comment 7 Package Review 2020-08-10 00:55:45 UTC
This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script.

The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month.
As per
we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it.