Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1363763
| Summary: | Review Request: nodejs-js-beautify - A jsbeautifier.org for node | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Jared Smith <jsmith.fedora> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
| Status: | NEW --- | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, vanmeeuwen+fedora |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | Type: | --- | |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | 1274736, 1352696 | ||
| Bug Blocks: | 956806, 1387531 | ||
|
Description
Jared Smith
2016-08-03 13:44:12 UTC
No matching package to install: 'npm(benchmark)' No matching package to install: 'npm(jshint)' Please correct the following rpmlint issues: nodejs-jshint.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/nodejs-jshint/examples/.jshintrc nodejs-jshint.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/nodejs-jshint/examples/.customignore nodejs-jshint.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/nodejs-jshint/examples/.jshintignore nodejs-jshint.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/jshint/bin/build /usr/bin/env node nodejs-jshint.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/jshint/bin/jshint /usr/bin/env node nodejs-jshint.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/jshint/bin/land /usr/bin/env node nodejs-jshint.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/jshint/bin/apply /usr/bin/env node Sorry about comment #2... I suspect these may be required for tests: nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/resources/configerror/subDir1/subDir2/empty.txt nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: zero-length /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/resources/indent11chars/subDir1/subDir2/empty.txt nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/resources/configerror/.jsbeautifyrc nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/resources/indent11chars/.jsbeautifyrc But I'm not sure whether these files need to be executable: nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/amd-beautify-tests.js nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: script-without-shebang /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/node-beautify-tests.js Also, wrong interpreter errors, but apparently the guidelines on that have not yet passed; nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/lib/cli.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/bin/css-beautify.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/bin/js-beautify.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/bin/html-beautify.js /usr/bin/env node nodejs-js-beautify.noarch: E: wrong-script-interpreter /usr/lib/node_modules/js-beautify/js/test/shell-smoke-test.sh /usr/bin/env bash This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time, but it seems that the review is still being working out by you. If this is right, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag and try to reach out the submitter to proceed with the review. If you're not interested in reviewing this ticket anymore, please clear the fedora-review flag and reset the assignee, so that a new reviewer can take this ticket. Without any reply, this request will shortly be resetted. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket reviewer failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we reset the status and the assignee of this ticket. |