Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1423312
| Summary: | cppcheck: FTBFS in rawhide | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Fedora Release Engineering <releng> | ||||||||
| Component: | cppcheck | Assignee: | Susi Lehtola <susi.lehtola> | ||||||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||||||
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||||||
| Priority: | unspecified | ||||||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | jwakely, mtasaka, susi.lehtola | ||||||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||||||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||||
| Last Closed: | 2017-02-17 05:16:04 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||||||
| Bug Depends On: | |||||||||||
| Bug Blocks: | 1423041 | ||||||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||||
|
Description
Fedora Release Engineering
2017-02-17 03:35:12 UTC
Created attachment 1251687 [details]
build.log
Created attachment 1251688 [details]
root.log
Created attachment 1251689 [details]
state.log
mtasaka's cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=859801 The cppcheck code was unconventional but it was valid. It was rejected due to a GCC bug. I created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 to track that bug. The patch in cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 makes the code more idiomatic C++ and avoids the GCC bug. mtasaka, please could you add that GCC bug URL to the upstream ticket at http://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/7910 so they have that information. Thanks. (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5) > The cppcheck code was unconventional but it was valid. It was rejected due > to a GCC bug. I created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 > to track that bug. The patch in cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 makes the code more > idiomatic C++ and avoids the GCC bug. Looks like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 is some different bug. Would you point to the corrent bug? Sorry, I meant https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566 Okay, thank you. Reported cppcheck upstream. Confirmed that this is fixed in gcc-7.0.1-0.10.fc26 . |