Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1423312 - cppcheck: FTBFS in rawhide
Summary: cppcheck: FTBFS in rawhide
Keywords:
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: cppcheck
Version: rawhide
Hardware: Unspecified
OS: Unspecified
unspecified
unspecified
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Susi Lehtola
QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance
URL:
Whiteboard:
Depends On:
Blocks: F26FTBFS
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
 
Reported: 2017-02-17 03:35 UTC by Fedora Release Engineering
Modified: 2017-02-27 07:44 UTC (History)
3 users (show)

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-17 05:16:04 UTC
Type: ---
Embargoed:

Attachments (Terms of Use)
build.log (912.67 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-17 03:35 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
root.log (93.53 KB, text/plain)
2017-02-17 03:35 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
state.log (619 bytes, text/plain)
2017-02-17 03:35 UTC, Fedora Release Engineering 		no flags Details
View All

Description Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 03:35:12 UTC 
Your package cppcheck failed to build from source in current rawhide.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17712598

For details on mass rebuild see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_26_Mass_Rebuild
Comment 1 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 03:35:21 UTC 
Created attachment 1251687 [details]
build.log
Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 03:35:24 UTC 
Created attachment 1251688 [details]
root.log
Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2017-02-17 03:35:27 UTC 
Created attachment 1251689 [details]
state.log
Comment 4 Upstream Release Monitoring 2017-02-17 05:07:58 UTC 
mtasaka's cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=859801
Comment 5 Jonathan Wakely 2017-02-20 12:36:53 UTC 
The cppcheck code was unconventional but it was valid. It was rejected due to a GCC bug. I created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 to track that bug. The patch in cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 makes the code more idiomatic C++ and avoids the GCC bug.

mtasaka, please could you add that GCC bug URL to the upstream ticket at http://trac.cppcheck.net/ticket/7910 so they have that information. Thanks.
Comment 6 Mamoru TASAKA 2017-02-20 12:51:56 UTC 
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> The cppcheck code was unconventional but it was valid. It was rejected due
> to a GCC bug. I created https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977
> to track that bug. The patch in cppcheck-1.77-3.fc26 makes the code more
> idiomatic C++ and avoids the GCC bug.

Looks like https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61977 is some different bug. Would you point to the corrent bug?
Comment 7 Jonathan Wakely 2017-02-20 14:11:36 UTC 
Sorry, I meant https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79566
Comment 8 Mamoru TASAKA 2017-02-20 14:29:23 UTC 
Okay, thank you. Reported cppcheck upstream.
Comment 9 Mamoru TASAKA 2017-02-27 07:44:56 UTC 
Confirmed that this is fixed in gcc-7.0.1-0.10.fc26 .
Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.