Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1424857

Summary: flatpak-builder should depend on bzip2
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Guy Taylor <thebigguy.co.uk>
Component: flatpakAssignee: David King <amigadave>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 25CC: amigadave, extras-qa, upstream-release-monitoring
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc26 flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 1422064 Environment:
Last Closed: 2017-02-24 22:50:05 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Require bzip2 for flatpak-builder none

Description Guy Taylor 2017-02-19 22:20:26 UTC
As it is common for archive packages to be compressed with bzip2 (tar.bz2) the flatpak-builder RPM package should depend on bzip2. This would help prevent painful debugging of build errors and make it "Just Work"™ in more situations.

Example affected build spec: https://github.com/KDE/flatpak-kde-applications/blob/c7b34f2d19cf4a951fda7d1900094ccfdff050b8/org.kde.krita.json#L32

Comment 1 Guy Taylor 2017-02-19 22:34:15 UTC
Created attachment 1255554 [details]
Require bzip2 for flatpak-builder

I am new to RPMs coming from the DEB world but I believe this would solve the issue.

Note: flatpak-builder does not call "bzip2" itself bit uses "tar -j".

Comment 2 David King 2017-02-19 23:12:17 UTC
Thanks for the patch. I had already prepared a patch which was a bit more complete (bumping the release number and adding a changelog entry) but the Requires change was sound. The Rawhide build is done, and builds for stable releases will follow soon.

Comment 3 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 07:39:45 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-87896dfb59

Comment 4 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 07:41:28 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bc7abf175b

Comment 5 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 20:23:29 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-bc7abf175b

Comment 6 Fedora Update System 2017-02-20 21:22:29 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-87896dfb59

Comment 7 Fedora Update System 2017-02-24 22:50:05 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

Comment 8 Fedora Update System 2017-03-01 01:20:23 UTC
flatpak-0.8.3-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.