Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 1483298 (deepin-launcher)
Summary: | Review Request: deepin-launcher - Deepin desktop-environment Launcher module | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | sensor.wen |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 <zebob.m> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | package-review, zebob.m |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | zebob.m:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-07-22 13:30:26 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 1419330, 1476590, 1476596 | ||
Bug Blocks: | 1465889 |
Description
sensor.wen
2017-08-20 08:43:25 UTC
Hello, Some similar issues as before: - You must post both SPEC URL and SRPM URL. It's used by fedora review to fetch the files from a bug number. - The latest version is 4.1.7, not 4.1.6 - Just use: %global repo dde-launcher - Use pkgconfig where you can: BuildRequires: pkgconfig(dtkbase) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(dframeworkdbus) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gsettings-qt) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(gtk+-2.0) BuildRequires: qt5-linguist BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Qt5) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Qt5Svg) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(Qt5X11Extras) BuildRequires: pkgconfig(xcb-ewmh) - If you install icons your must run the scriptlets described in this section: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets#Icon_Cache You also need to add a: Requires: hicolor-icon-theme - I wasn't able to build the project because it seems a BR is missing: Project ERROR: dtkcore development package not found Have you packaged this yet? https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkcore SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-i386/00593013-deepin-launcher/deepin-launcher.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-i386/00593013-deepin-launcher/deepin-launcher-4.1.7-1.fc26.src.rpm > - I wasn't able to build the project because it seems a BR is missing: > Project ERROR: dtkcore development package not found > Have you packaged this yet? https://github.com/linuxdeepin/dtkcore http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/development/rawhide/Everything/x86_64/os/Packages/d/dtkcore-devel-2.0.0-1.fc28.x86_64.rpm the dtkcore is approved. Why do you make a strict requirement to pkgconfig(dtkwidget) = 2.0 ? Shouldn't you used instead: pkgconfig(dtkwidget) >= 2.0 ? You still haven't put the BR for dtkcore. I can't build this because your copr package for dtkwidget require qtbase 5.7.1 and Fedora Rawhide provides qtbase 5.9. I don't think your package dtkwidget should depend on a specific version of Qt either. Please fix it. - dtkwidget: removed the require entry for Qt. https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/mosquito/deepin/build/593706/ - use '>=' instead '=' for dtkwidget I do not know if it is compatible with the new version, I only know it is not compatible with 1.0. So I used the "=" in Req entry. - add pkgconfig(dtkcore) BReq Fixd, Thanks a lot. Diff: https://github.com/FZUG/repo/commit/5f5c3c4660a88b31698f4052a36a500a83d2526b Small changes, no rebuild. I'll continue the Review once deepin-daemon is handled: bug #1476590. SPEC: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00594499-deepin-launcher/deepin-launcher.spec SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mosquito/deepin/fedora-26-x86_64/00594499-deepin-launcher/deepin-launcher-4.1.8-1.fc26.src.rpm Release 4.1.8 Package accepted. Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 362 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/deepin-launcher/review-deepin- launcher/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/services [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in deepin-launcher [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in deepin- launcher-debuginfo , deepin-launcher-debugsource [?]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. [x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM. (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/deepin-launcher This is already in Rawhide. Closing on behalf of the Deepin Desktop packaging effort. |