Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 165288

Summary: Review Request: libgdamm
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://www.gtkmm.org
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-13 20:51:39 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Updated Spec file none

Description Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-07 02:17:55 UTC 
Spec Name or Url:
http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libgdamm.spec

SRPM Name or Url: http://www.auroralinux.org/people/spot/review/libgdamm-1.3.7-1.src.rpm

Description: C++ wrappers for libgda. libgdamm is part of gnomemm - the C++
interface to the GTK+ GUI library.

This package was requested to help clear the path for glom. The spec is pretty typical for a gtk lib. 

Thanks in advance.
Comment 1 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-07 03:27:36 UTC 
libgdamm-devel "Requires: glibmm24-devel" because of C++ header contents
and "Requires: libgda-devel" because of pkg-config file dependencies.

Generic INSTALL file in %doc is of no interest to package users.

README in %doc is 24 bytes and pretty much useless (unless you insist
on packaging it because it _may_ change in the future).

--enable-docs doesn't do anything.

Both package descriptions are confusing, IMHO. I don't think "libgdamm
is part of gnomemm" (=> libgnomemm26 in Extras). It is "part of a set of
powerful C++ bindings for the GNOME libraries, which provide additional 
functionality above GTK+/gtkmm".

In -devel summary and description I usually add the information that
"libraries" are included, too.
Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-08-11 15:55:58 UTC 
Created attachment 117652 [details]
Updated Spec file

This updated spec makes the changes that you've pointed out. :)
Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-08-11 16:47:21 UTC 
Right. Approved.