Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 167406

Summary:	Review Request: perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy - Maketext from already interpolated strings
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jose Pedro Oliveira <jose.p.oliveira.oss>
Component:	Package Review	Assignee:	Tom "spot" Callaway <tcallawa>
Status:	CLOSED NEXTRELEASE	QA Contact:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	fedora-extras-list
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
URL:	http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy-0.02-1.src.rpm
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-09-10 01:28:04 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	163779

Description Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-02 13:19:42 UTC

Spec Name or Url:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy.spec
SRPM Name or Url:
http://gsd.di.uminho.pt/jpo/software/fedora/perl-Locale-Maketext-Fuzzy-0.02-1.src.rpm

Description:
This module is a subclass of Locale::Maketext, with additional
support for localizing messages that already contains interpolated
variables.  This is most useful when the messages are returned by
external modules -- for example, to match "dir: command not foundr"
against "[_1]: command not found".

Note:
This package is an RT 3.4 requirement

Comment 1 Ralf Corsepius 2005-09-02 13:57:58 UTC

APPROVED.

Comment 2 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-09-05 04:55:20 UTC

Kicking this back to FE-REVIEW, it is missing the license texts in %doc.

Comment 3 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-05 17:36:41 UTC

I have no plans of adding license files not include in the source tarball.

People installing only the binary RPMS won't be able to know if they were
added by the author or by a third party, and I don't want to induce someone
in error if I make mistakes (shipping incomplete license info, placing the
wrong license, ...).

So as of this moment I am also stopping updating/reviewing/approving packages.

Comment 4 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-09 11:02:59 UTC

CVS devel branch:
Added a comment about the license files location to the specfile.

Comment 5 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-10 00:38:52 UTC

Tom,

Can I consider this package and #167405 approved?

/jpo

Comment 6 Tom "spot" Callaway 2005-09-10 00:44:35 UTC

Yes.

Comment 7 Jose Pedro Oliveira 2005-09-10 01:28:04 UTC

Thanks.