Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 171090

Summary: Review Request: paps - Plain Text to PostScript(TM) converter
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Akira TAGOH <tagoh>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: Aurelien Bompard <gauret>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-package-review
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
URL: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/paps/
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-10-25 10:54:51 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779    

Description Akira TAGOH 2005-10-18 03:01:14 UTC 
Spec Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/paps/paps.spec
SRPM Name or Url: http://people.redhat.com/tagoh/paps/paps-0.3-1.src.rpm
Description: 

paps is a PostScript(TM) converter from plain text file using Pango.
Comment 1 Aurelien Bompard 2005-10-22 20:38:50 UTC 
* BuildRoot should be %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
  (wiki: PackagingGuidelines#BuildRoot)
* The package should contain the text of the license (the COPYING file)
  (wiki: PackageReviewGuidelines)
* The package does not honor RPM_OPT_FLAGS. Building with:
  make %{?_smp_mflags} CC="gcc $RPM_OPT_FLAGS"
  should do it.
Comment 2 Akira TAGOH 2005-10-25 02:47:37 UTC 
Thank you for reviewing. I've put the updated spec file and srpm file at the
same place.
Comment 3 Aurelien Bompard 2005-10-25 07:47:37 UTC 
* RPM name is OK
* Source paps-0.3.tgz is the same as upstream
* Builds fine in mock
* rpmlint of paps looks OK
* File list of paps looks OK
* Works fine
APPROVED

Next time please increase release when updating the package, it make it easier
to know which release has been approved.
Comment 4 Akira TAGOH 2005-10-25 10:54:51 UTC 
Sure. thanks.
Comment 5 Dov Grobgeld 2005-11-03 21:03:52 UTC 
Please use paps-0.5.tgz that I just released instead. It's postscript is up to
100 times more compact and it fixes several critical layout bugs.