Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 173553
Summary: | Review Request: xfce4-websearch-plugin | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Christoph Wickert <cwickert> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list, wtogami |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://xfce-goodies.berlios.de/ | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-01-22 20:44:30 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 |
Description
Christoph Wickert
2005-11-18 02:01:30 UTC
- Add libxfcegui4-devel BuildReqs. - Fix %defattr. New SRPM: http://home.arcor.de/christoph.wickert/fedora/extras-review/SRPMS/xfce4-websearch-plugin-0.1.0-4.fc4.src.rpm Set to FE-ACCEPT. (In reply to comment #2) > Set to FE-ACCEPT. Please read http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageReviewGuidelines#head-df547f180bcbcf2f2dd5d779246792ed70d0fa0b As a reviewer, you are supposed to own the bug (assign the PR to you). Pushing package back to FE-NEW (In reply to comment #3) I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. Are you in the approved group of reviewers?(In reply to comment #4) > (In reply to comment #3) > > I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. Are you in the approved group of package reviewers? (In reply to comment #5) > Are you in the approved group of reviewers?(In reply to comment #4) > > (In reply to comment #3) > > > > I wish I could assign this bug myself but I cannot change the bug status. > > Are you in the approved group of package reviewers? Yes I am + mock succesfully built the SRPM package. No error reported + rpmlint did not complain about warning and error. SPEC file conforms to PackagingGuideline http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingGuidelines + tarball from source rpm matched source url listed on spec file. Both matched by md5sum and sha1sum + name of package conforms to PackageNameGuideline procedure: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageNamingGuidelines + License listed on the SPEC file matches license on the tarball + no errors and crash reported after install and removal of the package Therefore the package is ready to be included in Fedora Extras. Set to FE-ACCEPT. Thanks. Please don't forget to change the status to "Assigned" when you review a package. Package builds fine fore core 3 and 4 so far, rawhide is inconsistent atm. Will do the devel builds in a few days. Closing. |