Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at

Bug 177247

Summary: Review Request: jthread
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Jeffrey C. Ollie <jeff>
Component: Package ReviewAssignee: John Mahowald <jpmahowald>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: David Lawrence <dkl>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: fedora-extras-list
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-03-01 02:52:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 163779, 177249    

Description Jeffrey C. Ollie 2006-01-08 07:24:41 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:

JThread provides some classes to make use of threads easy on different
platforms. The classes are actually rather simple wrappers around
existing thread implementations.

This is a dependency of JRTPLIB.

Comment 1 John Mahowald 2006-03-01 01:27:40 UTC

- rpmlint checks return:
E: jthread-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
False alarm, it's a symlink.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (MIT) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

- devel package ok
- no .la files
- devel requires base package n-v-r


Comment 2 Jeffrey C. Ollie 2006-03-01 02:52:57 UTC
Thansks for the review!

Comment 3 Christian Iseli 2006-04-08 20:46:30 UTC
Please add the package in owners.list