Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 178668
Summary: | Review Request: numpy: A fast multidimensional array facility for Python | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet> | ||||
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ed Hill <ed> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | David Lawrence <dkl> | ||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fedora-extras-list, ndbecker2 | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-16 16:34:59 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 163779 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2006-01-23 04:15:22 UTC
Hi Ignacio, this is just a very quick look, not a full review: good: + source matches upstream + specfile looks sane + license looks OK needswork: - the license should probably (?) be in %doc - in %build, CFLAGS is set twice (redundant) - build on FC-4 fails with this message: + /usr/bin/python -c 'import pkg_resources, numpy ; numpy.test(1, 1)' Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 1, in ? ImportError: No module named pkg_resources error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.44127 (%check) Updated. Created attachment 124151 [details]
rpmlint output
Hi Ignacio, heres a more thorough review: good: + good parts from comment #1 still good + rpmlint produces a bunch of warnings and errors but taking a look at them it appears that they're all just brain-dead rpmlint annoyances + package builds in mock for fc4-i386 + BR list looks good + shared libs looks good (no *.la) + dir ownership OK + no %files dupes + permissions OK + has correct clean bits + code not content + some headers and libs are included but its acceptable + ran some simple examples and no segfaults -- good and I don't see any blockers so its APPROVED. Built under FC4 and devel. |