Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.

Bug 1793032

Summary: python-flask-cors fails to build with Flask 1.1.1
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Miro Hrončok <mhroncok>
Component: python-flask-corsAssignee: František Zatloukal <fzatlouk>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 32CC: cstratak, fzatlouk, mhroncok
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: python-flask-cors-3.0.8-6.fc33 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-04-01 14:05:42 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1750908, 1785415    

Description Miro Hrončok 2020-01-20 14:18:50 UTC
python-flask-cors fails to build with Flask 1.1.1:

FAIL: test_acl_uncaught_exception_500 (tests.decorator.test_exception_interception.NoExceptionInterceptionTestCase)
NoExceptionInterceptionTestCase.test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/flask-cors-3.0.8/tests/decorator/test_exception_interception.py", line 209, in test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
    self.assertFalse(ACL_ORIGIN in resp.headers)
AssertionError: True is not false
-------------------- >> begin captured logging << --------------------
tests.decorator.test_exception_interception: ERROR: Exception on /test_acl_uncaught_exception_500 [GET]
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 2446, in wsgi_app
    response = self.full_dispatch_request()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1951, in full_dispatch_request
    rv = self.handle_user_exception(e)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1820, in handle_user_exception
    reraise(exc_type, exc_value, tb)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/_compat.py", line 39, in reraise
    raise value
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1949, in full_dispatch_request
    rv = self.dispatch_request()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/flask/app.py", line 1935, in dispatch_request
    return self.view_functions[rule.endpoint](**req.view_args)
  File "/builddir/build/BUILD/flask-cors-3.0.8/tests/decorator/test_exception_interception.py", line 30, in test_acl_uncaught_exception_500
    raise Exception("This could've been any exception")
Exception: This could've been any exception



We have talked about this in https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-flask/pull-request/6#comment-35883

This blocks the Python 3.9 rebuild.

Comment 1 Ben Cotton 2020-02-11 17:32:15 UTC
This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 32 development cycle.
Changing version to 32.

Comment 2 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-02-16 04:25:10 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 3 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-01 04:24:47 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has not been built successfully in 32. Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. Following the latest policy for such packages [2], your package
will be orphaned if this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks.

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/33/Schedule

Comment 4 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-08 04:24:49 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-03-16).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html

Comment 5 Fedora Release Engineering 2020-03-29 04:27:07 UTC
Dear Maintainer,

your package has an open Fails To Build From Source bug for Fedora 32.
Action is required from you.

If you can fix your package to build, perform a build in koji, and either create
an update in bodhi, or close this bug without creating an update, if updating is
not appropriate [1]. If you are working on a fix, set the status to ASSIGNED to
acknowledge this. If you have already fixed this issue, please close this Bugzilla report.

Following the policy for such packages [2], your package will be orphaned if
this bug remains in NEW state more than 8 weeks (that's on 2020-03-16).

A week before the mass branching of Fedora 33 according to the schedule [3],
any packages not successfully rebuilt at least on Fedora 31 will be
retired regardless of the status of this bug.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy
[2] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_source_Fails_to_install/
[3] https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-33/f-33-key-tasks.html

Comment 6 František Zatloukal 2020-04-01 14:05:42 UTC
Fixed in python-flask-cors-3.0.8-6.fc33 .

(By ignoring one test fail, proper upstream fix is still TBD)