Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 179710
Summary: | Review Request: dap-netcdf_handler - NetCDF 3 data handler for the OPeNDAP Data server | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Patrice Dumas <pertusus> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Ed Hill <ed> |
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | ||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-02-20 12:41:23 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 163779, 179707 |
Description
Patrice Dumas
2006-02-02 10:04:38 UTC
This bug depends on #179707, but circular dependencies are not allowed. Hi Patrice, I took a quick look at this package and noticed two blockers: - License is LGPL not GPL - The package naming does not follow the packaging guidelines in two ways: 1) the "_" delimiter is not permitted 2) this is an addon package so its name should be "dap-server-netcdf-handler" or similar There is an exception when there is a _ in the upstream name: "packages where the upstream name naturally contains an underscore are excluded from this." But I agree that there should be dap somewhere in the name. After some thinking, I am not convinced anymore that the handlers should depend on dap-server. Although it is unlikely, they could be used as stand alone apps, so I propose removing dependency on dap-server and calling the handler dap-netcdf_handler and so on, to retain the upstream _ but have a more informative name. Would this suit you? Hi Patrice, yes the "dap-netcdf_handler" name is fine so please go ahead and post an updated SRPM and I'll continue with the review. Here is the updated srpm: http://www.environnement.ens.fr/perso/dumas/fc-srpms/dap-netcdf_handler-3.5.2-1.src.rpm Looks good, I don't see any blockers: 8d4d9ff2cca772f840b3b5449addeefc dap-netcdf_handler-3.5.2-1.src.rpm good: + source matches upstream + builds in mock on FC4 + rpmlint reports no warnings or errors + spec is simple and easily read + dir ownership is good + license is good, and correctly included + no shared libs APPROVED. Normalize summary field for easy parsing |