Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at bugzilla.redhat.com.
Bug 180102
| Summary: | Review Request: embryo: A C like scripting language | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet> |
| Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | John Mahowald <jpmahowald> |
| Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Package Reviews List <fedora-package-review> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-04-27 17:51:11 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 163779, 180149 | ||
|
Description
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
2006-02-05 20:01:39 UTC
I think you gave the link to the wrong srpm there, but I found the proper one and gave a quick look. Are you sure that license is MIT? It seems to have an advertising clause that is not in the stock MIT license as found at http://www.opensource.org/licenses/mit-license.php, and indeed seems closer to the three clause BSD license (but I'm no expert). Here is the clause: The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of the Software and its Copyright notices. In addition publicly documented acknowledgment must be given that this software has been used if no source code of this software is made available publicly. This includes acknowledgments in either Copyright notices, Manuals, Publicity and Marketing documents or any documentation provided with any product containing this software. This License does not apply to any software that links to the libraries provided by this software (statically or dynamically), but only to the software provided. The BSD license prevents the use of the name of <ORGANIZATION> from being used to endorse or promote derived products, whereas this license requires acknowledgement if the source code is not made available. While it isn't MIT per se, it's certainly not BSD. rpmlint: E: embryo binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/bin/embryo ['/usr/lib64'] E: embryo-devel only-non-binary-in-usr-lib Symlink, ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (MIT-ish) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel package ok - no .la files - post/postun ldconfig ok - devel requires base package n-v-r APPROVED Built on FC4, FC5, and devel. |