Note: This is a public test instance of Red Hat Bugzilla. The data contained within is a snapshot of the live data so any changes you make will not be reflected in the production Bugzilla. Email is disabled so feel free to test any aspect of the site that you want. File any problems you find or give feedback at
Bug 180149 - Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library
Summary: Review Request: edje: A complex graphical design and layout library
Alias: None
Product: Fedora
Classification: Fedora
Component: Package Review
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Target Milestone: ---
Assignee: Christian Iseli
QA Contact: Fedora Package Reviews List
Depends On: 180052 180058 180102
TreeView+ depends on / blocked
Reported: 2006-02-06 10:34 UTC by Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams
Modified: 2007-11-30 22:11 UTC (History)
0 users

Fixed In Version:
Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Clone Of:
Last Closed: 2006-04-27 17:51:41 UTC
Type: ---

Attachments (Terms of Use)

Description Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-02-06 10:34:50 UTC
Spec Name or Url:
SRPM Name or Url:
Description: Edje is a complex graphical design & layout library. Its purpose is to be a sequel to "Ebits" which to date has serviced the needs of Enlightenment development for version 0.17. The original design parameters under which Ebits came about were a lot more restricted than the resulting use of them, thus Edje was born.

Comment 1 Jason Tibbitts 2006-02-06 20:19:22 UTC
Why does bug 180056 (system-config-httpd references obsolete module names) block

Comment 2 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-02-07 01:10:15 UTC
Because I'm blind.

Comment 3 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-04-18 16:42:22 UTC

Comment 4 Christian Iseli 2006-04-20 22:02:21 UTC
- rpmlint is ok
- name ok
- spec name ok
- packaging guidelines met
- license ok
- license matches actual license in package
- license file in %doc
- spec file in American English and legible
- source matches upstream
- builds, installs, runs, and uninstalls cleanly
- BuildRequires ok
- no locale to worry about
- shared libs ok
- -devel package ok
- no relocation to worry about
- no duplicated files
- files perms ok
- clean section ok
- macro useage ok
- package contains code
- no large doc
- %doc is only doc
- builds in mock

My machines here still run FC4, so I didn't check if the code actualy runs...
but I'll trust you on this one.

Why the empty %doc in the devel package ?

I think %{_datadir}/%{name}/ is more explicit than %{_datadir}/%{name}
but that's a matter of taste I guess...

rpmlint says:
E: edje non-executable-script /usr/share/edje/data/template/ 0644
E: edje non-executable-script /usr/share/edje/data/ 0644

W: edje-devel no-documentation

which I think can be ignored.


Comment 5 Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams 2006-04-27 17:51:41 UTC
Built on FC5 and devel.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.